Hydrohistorian
Town of Simla
Serves Simla.
Boundary traced from WSP. About 2 km².
Where the water comes from
| Facility | Kind | Water |
|---|---|---|
| SMALL PARK WELL REDRILL | Well | Groundwater |
| JACKSON SHOP WELL REDRILL | Well | Groundwater |
| TRACY WELL | Well | Groundwater |
| PILLOWKING WELL REDRILL | Well | Groundwater |
| ADAMS WELL REDRILL | Well | Groundwater |
These are EPA's facility records, not DWR structures. Which decreed rights sit behind an intake is the next phase; nothing here is inferred.
DWR structures that name this system
Source Probable join · fetched 2026-09-09 · matched on DWR's recorded contact or an EPA intake name; verify on the dossier
No DWR structure on file records this system as its contact, and none of its EPA intakes matches a structure name in its districts. DWR records a contact on only a fraction of structures, and only for districts fetched from its live service, so this is absence of a record, not evidence of no rights.
Compliance record
Source Register of another agency · fetched 2026-09-09 · verify at EPA ECHO ↗
No open violation and no health-based violation on EPA's federal record for this system at the last monthly fetch. That is a record of reported compliance, not a test result: SDWIS carries violations, not routine sample values.
EPA's own summary: violations in 1 of the last 12 quarters. In violation for, in EPA's words: 5000=Lead and Copper Rule. Currently: 5000=Lead and Copper Rule.
No health-based or open violation on the federal record for this system.
What the regulator did about it
23 enforcement actions on this system's federal record. In Colorado the state is the primacy agency, so most actions are the state's; EPA acts directly on tribal systems and when it steps in.
| Date | Action | By |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-26 | St Compliance achieved Copy of all 10 Lead Tap Result Consumer Notifications and COD received via portal on 01/26/2026. ARW (01/27/2026); |
state |
| 2026-01-07 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2026-01-07 | St Public Notif requested | state |
| 2021-02-11 | St Compliance achieved monitored next period. LAC 2/11/2021 |
state |
| 2020-12-30 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2020-12-30 | St Public Notif requested | state |
| 2020-12-30 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2020-12-30 | St Public Notif requested | state |
| 2020-10-29 | St Compliance achieved sampled approved sites in 2020. LAC 10/29/2020 |
state |
| 2020-01-13 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2020-01-13 | St Public Notif requested | state |
| 2020-01-13 | St Compliance achieved system submitted lead notice and COD. LAC 1/13/2020 |
state |
| 2019-12-27 | St Compliance achieved notice and COD received 12/27/2019. LAC 12/30/2019 |
state |
| 2019-12-27 | St Public Notif received applied SIF; PN performed for lead notice vio and for failure to sample from high risk LCR sites in 2019. LAC 12/27/2019 |
state |
| 2019-12-27 | St Compliance achieved | state |
| 2019-11-06 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2019-11-06 | St Public Notif requested | state |
| 2019-01-14 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2019-01-14 | St Public Notif requested | state |
| 2018-06-22 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
20 most recent of 23; the rest are on the ECHO report.
Lead and copper
The latest 90th-percentile lead result is 0.002 mg/L (sampling period ending 2025-12-31) against an action level of 0.015 mg/L, below it. 7 results on file.
The action level is not a health limit: it is the level at which the rule requires a system to act (corrosion control, public education, and in some cases replacing lead service lines). Lead mostly enters water from household plumbing, so a system-wide percentile does not tell you what comes out of one tap.
Violation, enforcement and lead/copper records are EPA SDWIS federal reporting, fetched monthly; the summary is EPA ECHO. Code names come from EPA's own REF_CODE_VALUE table. SDWIS carries violations, not routine sample results — nitrate, disinfection by-product and PFAS values are not in it, and a clean record here means nothing was reported as a violation, not that nothing was ever detected. For what was measured, ask the system for its Consumer Confidence Report.
PFAS and lithium: EPA's UCMR 5 monitoring, 2023–2025
Source Register of another agency · fetched 2026-09-09 · verify at EPA UCMR occurrence data ↗
EPA did not sample this system under UCMR 5 (the rule covered every system serving more than 3,300 people and a drawn sample of smaller ones).
Common questions
Who provides drinking water in Simla, Colorado?
The Town of Simla is the public water system serving 618 people in Elbert County, from groundwater. Its EPA public water system id is CO0120025.
Where does the Town of Simla get its water?
The Town of Simla reports groundwater as its primary source. EPA lists its source facilities as SMALL PARK WELL REDRILL, JACKSON SHOP WELL REDRILL, TRACY WELL, PILLOWKING WELL REDRILL.
Does the Town of Simla have any drinking water violations?
EPA's compliance record shows no open health-based violations for the Town of Simla at the last monthly fetch. Older and non-health-based entries, if any, are listed on this page.
Places this system serves
Census places its EPA service-area boundary substantially covers. Each page lists every system serving that place.
Every provider in Elbert County.
The record
EPA SDWIS federal reporting as of 2026-09-08; the compliance record above is EPA's own, fetched monthly, and the ECHO report carries the rest. Report a problem →