← All Colorado water providers

Peyton Pines

Peyton Pines is the public water system serving 56 people in El Paso County, from groundwater. EPA modelled this service area rather than tracing it from a utility map, so treat the edge as approximate.
Community system · EPA id CO0121610 · filed with EPA as “PEYTON PINES”
People served
56
Service connections
22
Primary source
Groundwater
Owner
Private
Counties served
El Paso
Water district

Modelled boundary. EPA estimated this service area (Random Forest) rather than tracing a utility-supplied map; treat the edge as approximate. About 0 km².

Where the water comes from

FacilityKindWater
WELL NO 5 MAIN WELL PRMT 044527WellGroundwater

These are EPA's facility records, not DWR structures. Which decreed rights sit behind an intake is the next phase; nothing here is inferred.

DWR structures that name this system

Source Probable join · fetched 2026-09-09 · matched on DWR's recorded contact or an EPA intake name; verify on the dossier

No DWR structure on file records this system as its contact, and none of its EPA intakes matches a structure name in its districts. DWR records a contact on only a fraction of structures, and only for districts fetched from its live service, so this is absence of a record, not evidence of no rights.

Compliance record

Source Register of another agency · fetched 2026-09-09 · verify at EPA ECHO ↗

1 violation open now, none health-based. These are monitoring, reporting or notice requirements — a sample not taken, or a result not filed on time. They are real obligations, but they are not a finding about the water itself.

EPA's own summary: violations in 12 of the last 12 quarters. In violation for, in EPA's words: 1040=Nitrate; 2456=Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5); 2950=TTHM; 4000=Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon and U; 4006=Combined Uranium; 7000=Consumer Confidence Rule. Currently: 7000=Consumer Confidence Rule.

What happened

All 3 violation records on file, grouped into the 3 distinct things EPA's codes describe. Dates are the compliance period the violation is filed against.

CCR Complete Failure to Report — Consumer Confidence Rule other 1 open
A requirement other than a limit, a sample or a notice was not met. 1 record, 1999-10-19. Highest measured: 0.0 against a limit of 0.0.
Rule: Consumer Confidence Report -- the annual report to customers.
OCCT/SOWT Study/Recommendation — Lead and Copper Rule health-based
A required treatment step was not carried out or not proved. 1 record, 2006-07-01.
Rule: Lead and Copper Rule -- corrosion of household plumbing.
Public Education — Lead and Copper Rule health-based
A required treatment step was not carried out or not proved. 1 record, 2006-07-01.
Rule: Lead and Copper Rule -- corrosion of household plumbing.
Every violation record, as filed (3 of 3)
Compliance periodWhatAboutKindStatusMeasured
2006-07-01 OCCT/SOWT Study/Recommendation Lead and Copper Rule health-based returned to compliance (2008-08-25)
2006-07-01 Public Education Lead and Copper Rule health-based returned to compliance (2008-08-25)
1999-10-19 CCR Complete Failure to Report Consumer Confidence Rule other open 0.0 (limit 0.0)

What the regulator did about it

22 enforcement actions on this system's federal record. In Colorado the state is the primacy agency, so most actions are the state's; EPA acts directly on tribal systems and when it steps in.

DateActionBy
2026-01-26 St Violation/Reminder Notice state
2026-01-26 St Public Notif requested state
2026-01-26 St Violation/Reminder Notice state
2026-01-26 St Public Notif requested state
2026-01-26 St Compliance achieved
FTM rads RTC through timely collected late reported samples, reported 1/14 & 1/15 but per wiki if supplier reported before vio issuance, the issuance date = SOX date (lfra 02/09/26);
state
2025-09-22 St Compliance achieved
FTM DBP in 2024 RTC through 2025 samples collected 09/22/25 reported 10/06/25 (lfra 11/12/25);
state
2024-11-27 St Compliance achieved
FTM changed to Late Reporting per 3Y2023-2025 results received via pdf on 11/27/24 indicating timely collection, SOXing vio with results receipt date and moving monitoring SqYr back to 2 and creating LCN schedule (lfra 12/02/24);
state
2024-11-04 St Violation/Reminder Notice state
2024-11-04 St Public Notif requested state
2024-11-04 St Violation/Reminder Notice state
2024-11-04 St Public Notif requested state
2024-01-21 St Compliance achieved
Nitrate FTR on time for YR2023, collected on time so RTC with late reporting date of 1/21/24 (lfra 3/25/24)
state
2024-01-16 St Violation/Reminder Notice state
2024-01-16 St Public Notif requested state
2021-10-07 St Compliance achieved
System collected required DBP sample in Sept 2021, reported 10/7/2021. hpo 11/12/2021
state
2021-07-16 St Boil Water Order state
2020-10-30 St Violation/Reminder Notice state
2020-10-30 St Public Notif requested state
2017-08-28 St Public Notif received state
2017-08-12 St Compliance achieved
System submitted CCR and updated cert of delivery form with good faith effort indicated. hpo
state

20 most recent of 22; the rest are on the ECHO report.

Lead and copper

The latest 90th-percentile lead result is 0.0 mg/L (sampling period ending 2025-12-31) against an action level of 0.015 mg/L, below it. 7 results on file.

The action level is not a health limit: it is the level at which the rule requires a system to act (corrosion control, public education, and in some cases replacing lead service lines). Lead mostly enters water from household plumbing, so a system-wide percentile does not tell you what comes out of one tap.

Violation, enforcement and lead/copper records are EPA SDWIS federal reporting, fetched monthly; the summary is EPA ECHO. Code names come from EPA's own REF_CODE_VALUE table. SDWIS carries violations, not routine sample results — nitrate, disinfection by-product and PFAS values are not in it, and a clean record here means nothing was reported as a violation, not that nothing was ever detected. For what was measured, ask the system for its Consumer Confidence Report.

PFAS and lithium: EPA's UCMR 5 monitoring, 2023–2025

Source Register of another agency · fetched 2026-09-09 · verify at EPA UCMR occurrence data ↗

EPA did not sample this system under UCMR 5 (the rule covered every system serving more than 3,300 people and a drawn sample of smaller ones).

Common questions

Who provides drinking water in Peyton, Colorado?

Peyton Pines is the public water system serving 56 people in El Paso County, from groundwater. Its EPA public water system id is CO0121610.

Where does Peyton Pines get its water?

Peyton Pines reports groundwater as its primary source. EPA lists its source facilities as WELL NO 5 MAIN WELL PRMT 044527.

Does Peyton Pines have any drinking water violations?

EPA's compliance record shows no open health-based violations for Peyton Pines at the last monthly fetch. Older and non-health-based entries, if any, are listed on this page.

Every provider in El Paso County.

The record

EPA SDWIS federal reporting as of 2026-09-08; the compliance record above is EPA's own, fetched monthly, and the ECHO report carries the rest. Report a problem →