Hydrohistorian
East Florence Water Association
Modelled boundary. EPA estimated this service area (Random Forest) rather than tracing a utility-supplied map; treat the edge as approximate. About 1 km².
Where the water comes from
| Facility | Kind | Water |
|---|---|---|
| PURCHASED SW FROM FLORENCE CO0122500 | Consecutive connection (purchased) | Surface water · from FLORENCE CITY OF |
These are EPA's facility records, not DWR structures. Which decreed rights sit behind an intake is the next phase; nothing here is inferred.
Wholesale connections
Buys water from FLORENCE CITY OF.
DWR structures that name this system
Source Probable join · fetched 2026-10-06 · matched on DWR's recorded contact or an EPA intake name; verify on the dossier
No DWR structure on file records this system as its contact, and none of its EPA intakes matches a structure name in its districts. DWR records a contact on only a fraction of structures, and only for districts fetched from its live service, so this is absence of a record, not evidence of no rights.
Compliance record
Source Register of another agency · fetched 2026-10-07 · verify at EPA ECHO ↗
No open violation and no health-based violation on EPA's federal record for this system at the last monthly fetch. That is a record of reported compliance, not a test result: SDWIS carries violations, not routine sample values.
EPA's own summary: violations in 3 of the last 12 quarters.
No health-based or open violation on the federal record for this system.
What the regulator did about it
52 enforcement actions on this system's federal record. In Colorado the state is the primacy agency, so most actions are the state's; EPA acts directly on tribal systems and when it steps in.
| Date | Action | By |
|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2024-11-07 | St Public Notif requested | state |
| 2024-11-07 | St Compliance achieved SOXing; SLI form received on 11/4/2024. MM 11/7/2024 |
state |
| 2024-05-31 | St Public Notif received PN performed with 2024 CCR. MM 6/3/2024 |
state |
| 2023-09-09 | St Compliance achieved SOX 9/9/2023 LCR samples reported in accordance with the rule FCL; |
state |
| 2023-06-01 | St Compliance achieved SOX'd CCR performed in accordance with the rule 06/01/2023 FCL |
state |
| 2023-02-24 | St Compliance achieved SOX routine DBP sample collected 2/13/23 and reported 2/24/23 FCL |
state |
| 2023-02-15 | St Compliance achieved | state |
| 2023-01-21 | St Public Notif received | state |
| 2023-01-12 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2023-01-12 | St Public Notif requested | state |
| 2023-01-03 | St Public Notif received PN and COD received 1/3/23 FCL |
state |
| 2022-10-21 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2022-10-21 | St Public Notif requested | state |
| 2022-10-17 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2022-10-17 | St Public Notif requested | state |
| 2022-07-15 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2022-07-15 | St Public Notif requested | state |
| 2022-07-11 | St Violation/Reminder Notice | state |
| 2022-07-11 | St Public Notif requested | state |
20 most recent of 52; the rest are on the ECHO report.
Lead and copper
The latest 90th-percentile lead result is 0.0012 mg/L (sampling period ending 2025-12-31) against an action level of 0.015 mg/L, below it. 6 results on file.
The action level is not a health limit: it is the level at which the rule requires a system to act (corrosion control, public education, and in some cases replacing lead service lines). Lead mostly enters water from household plumbing, so a system-wide percentile does not tell you what comes out of one tap.
Violation, enforcement and lead/copper records are EPA SDWIS federal reporting, fetched monthly; the summary is EPA ECHO. Code names come from EPA's own REF_CODE_VALUE table. SDWIS carries violations, not routine sample results — nitrate, disinfection by-product and PFAS values are not in it, and a clean record here means nothing was reported as a violation, not that nothing was ever detected. For what was measured, ask the system for its Consumer Confidence Report.
PFAS and lithium: EPA's UCMR 5 monitoring, 2023–2025
Source Register of another agency · fetched 2026-10-09 · verify at EPA UCMR occurrence data ↗
EPA did not sample this system under UCMR 5 (the rule covered every system serving more than 3,300 people and a drawn sample of smaller ones).
Common questions
Who provides drinking water in Florence, Colorado?
East Florence Water Association is the public water system serving 326 people in Fremont County, from purchased surface water. Its EPA public water system id is CO0122450.
Where does East Florence Water Association get its water?
East Florence Water Association reports purchased surface water as its primary source. EPA lists its source facilities as PURCHASED SW FROM FLORENCE CO0122500.
Does East Florence Water Association have any drinking water violations?
EPA's compliance record shows no open health-based violations for East Florence Water Association at the last monthly fetch. Older and non-health-based entries, if any, are listed on this page.
Every provider in Fremont County.
The record
EPA SDWIS federal reporting as of 2026-10-06; the compliance record above is EPA's own, fetched monthly, and the ECHO report carries the rest. Report a problem →