← Reference

Statutes and cases

The constitution, the articles of Title 37, and the decisions that made the doctrine. Years and holdings are from the text or the opinion page; a one-line holding is a pointer, not the ruling.

Colorado Constitution, article XVI

Title 37, Water and Irrigation

Within 37-92: §102 legislative declaration (ISF language L. 73); §103(10.3) RICD (L. 2001); Part 2 = water divisions and courts (§§201–204) — **§301 is administration, not water judges**; §302 applications/resume; §305 standards for rulings; §308 SWSPs (L. 2002); §401 tabulations and decennial abandonment lists; §501 State Engineer jurisdiction/curtailment. Also existing: 37-40/41/42/43/44/45.1, 80.5 (river water bank pilot), 85.5, 88, 89, 90.5 (geothermal), 93 (river basin authorities), 96, 96.5 (rooftop precipitation).

ArticleTitleEnactedWhat it does
37-45Water Conservancy Districts1937Water Conservancy Act; creation/powers of conservancy districts Primary text Justia
37-46Colorado River Water Conservation District1937creates the West Slope's River District Primary text Justia
37-47Southwestern Water Conservation District1941creates SWCD (San Juan/Dolores) Primary text Justia
37-48Rio Grande Water Conservation District1967creates RGWCD Primary text Justia
37-50Republican River Water Conservation District2004 (eff. Aug 4)creates RRWCD for compact compliance Primary text Justia
37-60Colorado Water Conservation Board1937creates CWCB; §106 duties Primary text Justia
37-61Colorado River Compact1923ratifies the 1922 compact Primary text Justia
37-62Upper Colorado River Compact1949ratifies 1948 Upper Basin compact Primary text Justia
37-63La Plata River Compact1923CO–NM Primary text Justia
37-64Animas-La Plata Project Compact1969CO–NM (not Costilla) Primary text Justia
37-65South Platte River Compact1925CO–NE Primary text Justia
37-66Rio Grande River Compact1939CO–NM–TX (1938 compact) Primary text Justia
37-67Republican River Compact1943CO–KS–NE Primary text Justia
37-68Amended Costilla Creek Compact1945 (amended 1963)CO–NM Primary text Justia
37-69Arkansas River Compact1949CO–KS (1948) Primary text Justia
37-75Interbasin Compacts2005 (eff. June 7)Colorado Water for the 21st Century Act: roundtables + IBCC Primary text Justia
37-80State Engineer1889office and duties Primary text Justia
37-81Diversion of Waters from Stateunverifiedexporting water out of Colorado Secondary reference Justia
37-82Appropriation and Use of Water§101 R&RE 1969streams subject to appropriation; general use rules; §106 imported/developed water reuse Primary text Justia
37-83Exchange of Water1897exchanges/transfers between streams; §104 transit loss Primary text Justia
37-84Responsibility of User or Owner1872 (territorial)ditch owner/user duties, headgates (§112) Primary text Justia
37-85Charge for Delivery of Water1887carrier-ditch charges Primary text Justia
37-86Rights-Of-Way and Ditches§101 1919ditch rights-of-way Primary text Justia
37-87Reservoirs1879storage rights, dam safety Primary text Justia
37-90Underground Water1965Ground Water Management Act; §105 small-capacity wells; §137 well permits outside designated basins Primary text Justia
37-91Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors1967licensing Primary text Justia
37-92Water Right Determination and Administration1969the 1969 Act Primary text Justia
37-95Colorado Water Resources and Power Development Authority1981finance authority Primary text Justia
37-97Water Metering Act1990metering Primary text Justia
37-98Water Resources Review Committee2001interim legislative committee Primary text Justia
37-99Prohibition of Nonfunctional Turf…unverifiedturf limits Secondary reference Justia

43 decisions

DecidedCaseCourt · citeHolding, in a line
1872-02-15Yunker v. NicholsColo. Terr. Sup. Ct. · 1 Colo. 551Ditch right-of-way across others' land is a necessity in arid Colorado Primary text opinion
1882-12-15Coffin v. Left Hand Ditch Co.Colo. · 6 Colo. 443Rejects riparian rights; prior appropriation governs incl. trans-basin Primary text opinion
1891-01-15Strickler v. City of Colorado SpringsColo. · 16 Colo. 61Rights are property; may be sold/changed absent injury Primary text opinion
1907-05-13Kansas v. ColoradoU.S. · 206 U.S. 46Equitable apportionment; each state chooses its water law Primary text opinion
1922-06-05Wyoming v. ColoradoU.S. · 259 U.S. 419Prior appropriation across state lines (Laramie) Primary text opinion
1943-12-06Colorado v. KansasU.S. · 320 U.S. 383Kansas not entitled to quantified Arkansas apportionment Primary text opinion
1945-06-11Nebraska v. WyomingU.S. · 325 U.S. 589North Platte apportionment decree Primary text opinion
1954-07-06Farmers Highline Canal v. City of GoldenColo. · 129 Colo. 575Change to municipal use conditioned to protect juniors Primary text opinion
1968-11-25Fellhauer v. PeopleColo. · 167 Colo. 320Well curtailment without rules arbitrary; "maximum utilization" Primary text opinion
1971-11-22Kuiper v. Well Owners Conservation Ass'nColo. · 490 P.2d 268Water judges review well rules; integrated administration Primary text opinion
1975-01-20 (often cited 1974)SE Colo. WCD v. Shelton FarmsColo. · 529 P.2d 1321No priority-free "salvaged water" from phreatophyte removal Primary text opinion
1979-04-23Colorado River WCD v. Vidler TunnelColo. · 594 P.2d 566Anti-speculation: conditional right needs firm end use Primary text opinion
1983-12-05 (Justia 1984-01-23)Alamosa-La Jara WUPA v. GouldColo. · 674 P.2d 914"Optimum use" balances max utilization with priority Primary text opinion
1995-05-15Kansas v. ColoradoU.S. · 514 U.S. 673Post-compact well pumping violated Arkansas compact Primary text opinion
2009-03-09Kansas v. Colorado (final)U.S. · 556 U.S. 98Final judgment Primary text opinion
1996-10-15City of Thornton v. Bijou IrrigationColo. · 926 P.2d 1Thornton Northern Project decree affirmed with conditions Primary text opinion
1999-12-06Santa Fe Trail Ranches v. SimpsonColo. · 990 P.2d 46Change requires actual lawful historical beneficial use Primary text opinion
2001-12-17 (mod. 2002-02-11)Empire Lodge HOA v. MoyerColo. · 39 P.3d 1139Out-of-priority diversions need a decreed augmentation plan Primary text opinion
2003-05-27Simpson v. Bijou IrrigationColo. · 69 P.3d 50State Engineer cannot authorize well depletions via replacement plans without a water-court application Primary text opinion
2000-11-20Arapahoe County v. Crystal Creek HOAColo. · 14 P.3d 325Union Park conditional rights denied ("Arapahoe II") Primary text opinion
2003-05-19State Engineer v. City of GoldenColo. · 69 P.3d 1027Golden kayak-course RICD under pre-2001 law (holding not confirmed from text) Primary text opinion
2005-03-14CWCB v. Upper Gunnison River WCDColo. · 109 P.3d 585Construes the 2001 RICD statute Primary text opinion
1995-09-11Aspen Wilderness Workshop v. CWCBColo. · 901 P.2d 1251CWCB holds ISF rights in a fiduciary capacity (Snowmass Creek) Primary text opinion
2005-09-12High Plains A&M v. SE Colo. WCDColo. · 120 P.3d 710Anti-speculation applies to changes Primary text opinion
2005-09-12ISG v. Arkansas Valley Ditch Ass'nColo. · 120 P.3d 724Companion; speculative Fort Lyon change dismissed Primary text opinion
2007-10-22Pagosa Area W&SD v. Trout UnlimitedColo. · 170 P.3d 307Municipal conditional rights need a reasonable planning period Primary text opinion
2009-11-23Pagosa IIColo. · 219 P.3d 7742055 horizon reasonable; unsupported quantities reversed Primary text opinion
2006-12-04Gallegos v. Colo. Ground Water Comm'nColo. · 147 P.3d 20Commission must redraw designated-basin boundaries on evidence Primary text opinion
2009-11-23Well Augmentation Subdistrict v. City of AuroraColo. · 221 P.3d 399WAS must replace continuing pre-2003 depletions Primary text opinion
2011-05-31Burlington Ditch v. Metro WastewaterColo. · 256 P.3d 645HCU limits exclude unlawful enlargement/expanded use Primary text opinion
2001-11-13Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation v. Consolidated Mutual WaterColo. · 33 P.3d 799Historic-use findings in a change decree cannot be relitigated under retained jurisdiction Primary text opinion
1993-07-26Public Service Co. v. Willows Water Dist.Colo. · 856 P.2d 829Nontributary return flows may be reused; dominion without piping Primary text opinion
2008-11-24Buffalo Park v. Mountain Mutual ReservoirColo. · 195 P.3d 674Failed to prove unappropriated water / non-injurious augmentation Primary text opinion
2015-06-29St. Jude's Co. v. Roaring Fork ClubColo. · 2015 CO 51Private flow-through aesthetic/recreation diversions not beneficial use Primary text opinion
1998-04-20Chatfield East Well Co. v. Chatfield East POAColo. · 956 P.2d 1260Denver Basin water is a public resource; landowner has use right Primary text opinion
1976-06-01Cache La Poudre WUA v. Glacier View MeadowsColo. · 550 P.2d 288Early augmentation plan approved Primary text opinion
2004-01-12City of Golden v. SimpsonColo. · 83 P.3d 87No right to keep diverting at Church Ditch during the 2002 call Primary text opinion
1963-06-03Arizona v. CaliforniaU.S. · 373 U.S. 546Lower Basin mainstem apportionment 4.4/2.8/0.3 Primary text opinion
2018-03-05Texas v. New Mexico & ColoradoU.S. · 138 S. Ct. 954U.S. may intervene under Rio Grande Compact Primary text opinion
2015-02-24Kansas v. Nebraska (& Colorado)U.S. · 574 U.S. 445Nebraska breached Republican compact; disgorgement Primary text opinion
1997-05-19Turkey Cañon RanchColo. · 937 P.2d 739Objector standing requires a vested/conditional right Primary text opinion
1976-03-24Colorado River WCD v. United StatesU.S. · 424 U.S. 800McCarran Amendment: state courts adjudicate reserved rights Primary text opinion
1995-02-21Arapahoe County v. United StatesColo. · 891 P.2d 952Union Park conditional rights dismissed ("Arapahoe I") Primary text opinion

Corrections the research made to common citations: 37-92-301 is administration and distribution, not water judges (those are Part 2); Farmers Reservoir v. Consolidated Mutual (2001) is about retained jurisdiction, not ditch-wide analysis; Arapahoe County v. Crystal Creek (2000) is the Union Park case, not a recreation case; a "CWCB v. City of Golden, 108 P.3d 1005" does not exist, the Golden kayak-course case is State Engineer v. City of Golden (2003). Advisory, not legal advice. Report a problem →