← My Water · Print / save as PDF
EMPIRE DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 0100501 · 1 · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:05 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1905-05-18 — 414th most senior of the 7705 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: KLUG RES 1 (1905-02-21). Immediately behind: EMPIRE RES (1905-05-18).
Decreed rights (4)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20226.0 | 1905-05-18 | 1914-01-15 | 612.48 | 0.0 | C | STO | |
| 20543.0 | 1906-03-31 | 1914-01-15 | 612.48 | 0.0 | C | IRRRECFIS | |
| 26302.20226 | 1905-05-18 | 1936-01-13 | 612.48 | 0.0 | C | STO | |
| 31423.29219 | 1929-12-31 | 1965-06-08 | 612.48 | 0.0 | C | STO |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 56,353 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 32,092 AF — 57% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 75,254 | 15th lowest of 15 · 134% of median | — | 236 | 401.0 |
| 2011 | 62,863 | 13th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | — | 225 | 340.0 |
| 2012 | 45,976 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 82% of median | — | 140 | 372.0 |
| 2013 | 65,862 | 14th lowest of 15 · 117% of median | — | 143 | 441.0 |
| 2014 | 52,627 | 6th lowest of 15 · 93% of median | — | 244 | 366.0 |
| 2015 | 56,353 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | — | 231 | 429.0 |
| 2016 | 62,349 | 12th lowest of 15 · 111% of median | — | 245 | 358.0 |
| 2017 | 57,874 | 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median | — | 258 | 360.0 |
| 2018 | 59,348 | 10th lowest of 15 · 105% of median | — | 218 | 342.0 |
| 2019 | 51,146 | 5th lowest of 15 · 91% of median | — | 236 | 309.0 |
| 2020 | 55,676 | 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median | — | 166 | 392.0 |
| 2021 | 62,140 | 11th lowest of 15 · 110% of median | — | 204 | 352.0 |
| 2022 | 42,932 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 76% of median | — | 170 | 289.0 |
| 2023 | 49,063 | 4th lowest of 15 · 87% of median | — | 294 | 1662.0 |
| 2024 | 32,092 | 1st lowest of 15 · 57% of median | — | 135 | 221.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.