← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

OLIVER DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 0100657 · 1 · LONE TREE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:05 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1887-04-12322nd most senior of the 7705 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CONSOLIDATED LARSON D (1885-12-28). Immediately behind: OLIVER SAND CREEK DITCH (1887-05-14).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
16761.136161887-04-121914-01-15 20.00.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 10 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 468 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 1,217 AF — 260% of that, and 10th lowest of the 10 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2015 448 5th lowest of 10 · 96% of median 95 4.3
2016 255 1st lowest of 10 · 54% of median 87 3.7
2017 331 2nd lowest of 10 · 71% of median 97 4.6
2018 419 3rd lowest of 10 · 90% of median 146 3.9
2019 443 4th lowest of 10 · 95% of median 184 3.9
2020 488 6th lowest of 10 · 104% of median 136 4.3
2021 724 9th lowest of 10 · 155% of median 260 4.6
2022 609 7th lowest of 10 · 130% of median 170 5.6
2023 719 8th lowest of 10 · 154% of median 179 7.5
2024 1,217 10th lowest of 10 · 260% of median 193 8.9

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.