← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

FIRESTACK DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 0100714 · 1 · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:15 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1914-06-143575th most senior of the 7705 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WILDCAT RES (1908-04-11). Immediately behind: GARDNER BROTHERS WELL 2 (1922-04-15).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
45655.23541914-06-141975-12-31 6.00.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 392 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 972 AF — 248% of that, and 13th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2005 276 5th lowest of 15 · 70% of median 87 3.0
2006 58 1st lowest of 15 · 15% of median 41 1.0
2007 392 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 62 4.0
2008 255 4th lowest of 15 · 65% of median 45 3.0
2014 704 11th lowest of 15 · 180% of median 197 4.0
2015 1,627 15th lowest of 15 · 415% of median 253 8.0
2016 1,018 14th lowest of 15 · 260% of median 268 4.0
2017 558 10th lowest of 15 · 142% of median 233 2.5
2018 334 6th lowest of 15 · 85% of median 135 3.0
2019 375 7th lowest of 15 · 96% of median 66 3.0
2020 531 9th lowest of 15 · 136% of median 176 3.0
2021 90 2nd lowest of 15 · 23% of median 37 2.0
2022 747 12th lowest of 15 · 191% of median 180 2.5
2023 101 3rd lowest of 15 · 26% of median 25 2.5
2024 972 13th lowest of 15 · 248% of median 245 2.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3687 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 47% of the irrigation seasons in 1987-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.