← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

LOWER P & B EMERSON LAKE

Structure dossier · WDID 0102018 · RA · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:48 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1979-04-183749th most senior of the 7705 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: D ALESSANDRO NNT UDA WELL 106954 (1979-03-13). Immediately behind: MAGNUSON FLOOD DIVR A (1979-06-30).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
47224.01979-04-181979-12-31 63.50.0 AAUGRCH

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 201 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 94 AF — 47% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 337 14th lowest of 15 · 168% of median 24 15.9
2011 248 11th lowest of 15 · 123% of median 88 5.0
2012 139 6th lowest of 15 · 69% of median 19 8.3
2013 117 3rd lowest of 15 · 58% of median 26 7.5
2014 182 7th lowest of 15 · 90% of median 35 6.4
2015 201 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 22 13.8
2016 85 1st lowest of 15 · 42% of median 19 3.9
2017 407 15th lowest of 15 · 202% of median 59 20.6
2018 241 10th lowest of 15 · 120% of median 48 4.9
2019 218 9th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 47 4.4
2020 133 5th lowest of 15 · 66% of median 27 4.4
2021 268 12th lowest of 15 · 133% of median 75 6.3
2022 124 4th lowest of 15 · 62% of median 30 4.5
2023 311 13th lowest of 15 · 155% of median 16 18.6
2024 94 2nd lowest of 15 · 47% of median 10 6.7

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 876 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 10% of the irrigation seasons in 1982-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.