Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
RIVERSIDE NAT FARMS POND 1
Structure dossier · WDID 0102048 · RA · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 22:56 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1988-11-04 — 4048th most senior of the 7705 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: COLO STATE LND BD LDA-21 (1988-11-01). Immediately behind: RIVERSIDE NAT FARMS POND 2 (1988-11-04).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50712.0 | 1988-11-04 | 1988-12-31 | 368.0 | 0.0 | A | IRRRECFISDOMSTKAUGRCHWLD |
Legal record & documents
1 decreed actions on record across
1 court case:
88CW0264A.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
88CW0264A | 1 | 1988-12-31 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,805 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 1,670 AF — 92% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 1,260 | 5th lowest of 15 · 70% of median | 80 | 25.2 |
| 2011 | 3,343 | 15th lowest of 15 · 185% of median | 115 | 51.5 |
| 2012 | 1,011 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 56% of median | 23 | 40.0 |
| 2013 | 1,805 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 33 | 55.3 |
| 2014 | 1,482 | 6th lowest of 15 · 82% of median | 59 | 44.5 |
| 2015 | 3,044 | 12th lowest of 15 · 169% of median | 108 | 38.7 |
| 2016 | 3,256 | 14th lowest of 15 · 180% of median | 123 | 59.0 |
| 2017 | 2,659 | 11th lowest of 15 · 147% of median | 105 | 39.4 |
| 2018 | 2,268 | 10th lowest of 15 · 126% of median | 78 | 31.1 |
| 2019 | 3,048 | 13th lowest of 15 · 169% of median | 111 | 27.3 |
| 2020 | 1,227 | 4th lowest of 15 · 68% of median | 39 | 28.3 |
| 2021 | 2,193 | 9th lowest of 15 · 122% of median | 69 | 37.8 |
| 2022 | 76 | 1st lowest of 15 · 4% of median | 3 | 24.1 |
| 2023 | 454 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 25% of median | 61 | 29.7 |
| 2024 | 1,670 | 7th lowest of 15 · 92% of median | 304 | 42.0 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 1 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 2116 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 28% of the irrigation seasons in 1988-2024 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.