← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

RIVERSIDE NAT FARMS POND 2

Structure dossier · WDID 0102069 · RA · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:40 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1988-11-044049th most senior of the 7705 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: RIVERSIDE NAT FARMS POND 1 (1988-11-04). Immediately behind: ELIZABETH NNT UDA WELL FIELD (1988-11-21).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
50712.01988-11-041988-12-31 460.00.0 AIRRRECFISDOMSTKAUGRCHWLD

Recorded use (last 9 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 536 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 161 AF — 30% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 9 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2015 689 8th lowest of 9 · 128% of median 73 16.6
2016 678 7th lowest of 9 · 126% of median 72 16.4
2017 593 6th lowest of 9 · 111% of median 63 14.4
2018 431 3rd lowest of 9 · 80% of median 45 14.9
2019 706 9th lowest of 9 · 132% of median 71 14.4
2020 76 1st lowest of 9 · 14% of median 11 6.4
2021 433 4th lowest of 9 · 81% of median 34 16.9
2023 536 5th lowest of 9 · 100% of median 57 16.6
2024 161 2nd lowest of 9 · 30% of median 16 17.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 442 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 23% of the irrigation seasons in 2015-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.