Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
RIVERSIDE GROVES S RECHARGE AREA
Structure dossier · WDID 0102087 · RA · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 22:55 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 2003-04-17 — 4815th most senior of the 7705 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HOOTEN/SLATER LFH WL FLD (2003-03-31). Immediately behind: RIVERSIDE GROVES N RECHARGE AREA (2003-04-17).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55989.0 | 2003-04-17 | 2002-12-31 | 0.0 | 21.0 | A | FISRCHWLD | |
| 55989.0 | 2003-04-17 | 2002-12-31 | 10.82 | 29.18 | C | FISRCHWLD |
Legal record & documents
2 decreed actions on record across
2 court cases:
14CW3082, 02CW0086.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
14CW3082 | 1 | 2002-12-31 | S |
02CW0086 | 1 | 2002-12-31 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 13 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 83 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2023, came in at 70 AF — 84% of that, and 5th lowest of the 13 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 233 | 13th lowest of 13 · 281% of median | 63 | 10.8 |
| 2010 | 6 | 1st lowest of 13 · 7% of median | 10 | 0.4 |
| 2011 | 134 | 9th lowest of 13 · 161% of median | 84 | 3.4 |
| 2013 | 8 | 2nd lowest of 13 · 10% of median | 4 | 2.3 |
| 2014 | 42 | 4th lowest of 13 · 51% of median | 16 | 1.8 |
| 2015 | 83 | 7th lowest of 13 · 100% of median | 19 | 7.6 |
| 2016 | 169 | 11th lowest of 13 · 204% of median | 52 | 12.9 |
| 2017 | 82 | 6th lowest of 13 · 99% of median | 40 | 6.7 |
| 2018 | 14 | 3rd lowest of 13 · 17% of median | 8 | 1.5 |
| 2019 | 148 | 10th lowest of 13 · 178% of median | 40 | 14.0 |
| 2020 | 94 | 8th lowest of 13 · 113% of median | 32 | 4.0 |
| 2021 | 229 | 12th lowest of 13 · 276% of median | 49 | 14.6 |
| 2023 | 70 | 5th lowest of 13 · 84% of median | 28 | 1.5 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 13 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 2 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 445 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 11% of the irrigation seasons in 2005-2023 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.