← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BAUMGARTNER WELL 1-21172 (7176)

Structure dossier · WDID 0105629 · 2 · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 01:24 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1884-04-0750th most senior of the 7705 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: S PLATTE FARMS 2-10481 (1884-02-21). Immediately behind: CANEVA WELL 1-8653 (1884-04-07).

Decreed rights (3)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
12516.01884-04-071895-11-21 0.00.0 CIRR
14185.01888-11-011895-11-21 0.00.0 CIRR
39191.01957-04-201972-12-31 2.490.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 13 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 106 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 106 AF — 100% of that, and 7th lowest of the 13 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2012 9 1st lowest of 13 · 8% of median 6 1.6
2013 76 5th lowest of 13 · 72% of median 54 1.7
2014 203 10th lowest of 13 · 192% of median 98 2.1
2015 157 9th lowest of 13 · 148% of median 77 1.6
2016 56 4th lowest of 13 · 53% of median 31 2.0
2017 49 3rd lowest of 13 · 46% of median 30 1.8
2018 126 8th lowest of 13 · 119% of median 59 1.7
2019 96 6th lowest of 13 · 91% of median 46 1.7
2020 265 13th lowest of 13 · 250% of median 76 3.3
2021 22 2nd lowest of 13 · 21% of median 15 1.5
2022 217 11th lowest of 13 · 205% of median 113 1.5
2023 252 12th lowest of 13 · 238% of median 59 4.4
2024 106 7th lowest of 13 · 100% of median 59 1.9

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 3 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 723 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 28% of the irrigation seasons in 2012-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.