HIGHLAND WELL 1-013615-F ☆ My Water

Well permit on file (1)

DWR ties this well permit to WDID 0106932. A permit is the authorization to construct and use the well — not a water right, and separate from the decrees on this page (three things called “well”).

Current administration

● Fully called out — call at NORTH STERLING CANAL (SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, priority 1922-01-05).

Which of its rights are out of priority?

The outlook for the weeks ahead is not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it. Today’s position is a separate question, and it is answered in Current administration above — that screen reads the district’s active calls and needs no reference gage.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1945-12-31 — 1753rd most senior of the 7708 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: ELDER WELL 2-107R (1945-12-31)☆. Immediately behind: LOW FLAT WELL 37094 (1945-12-31)☆.

Decreed rights (1)

Amounts marked cfs are flow rates; AF are stored volumes (storage rights are decreed in acre-feet). An absolute amount of 0.0 beside an alt-point amount is not a dead right: the water is decreed at another structure, and that row records permission to divert it here instead (an alternate point or exchange). A case listing several numbers reflects the original decree plus later change cases.

How much of this decree was in priority, by day

A right is in priority on a day when it is senior to every call administering this structure. Of its 0.555 cfs decreed rate, the average day over the last 5 year(s) had 0.555 cfs in priority (100% of the decree). No call in effect is a free river — that was 100.0% of days.

Calls are set and released at a time of day, not at midnight, so a day is counted by the hour: a call setting at 4pm costs that day a third of its rate, not all of it.

This is paper water. It is the decreed rate that was in priority — not water that was physically in the stream, and not water this structure diverted. A ditch can be in priority for 50 cfs on a day the creek carries five. What that distinction means →

Legal record & documents

5 decreed actions on record across 3 court cases: W2445, 08CW0061, 04CW0057.

249 imaged documents on DWR’s shelf for this structure — 13 water-court documents across 3 cases, including 3 decrees. Every row opens the scanned PDF at DWR. Listing as of 2026-09-23.

Imaged documents at DWR. DWR keeps the scanned documents for this structure — decrees, rulings, plats, correspondence — in its Laserfiche archive. Open the list directly: imaged documents for 0106932 ↗ (indexed by structure, not by case — the cases listed above appear within the list).

Other DWR records for this structure: DWR’s page for this structure ↗ — net amounts, water rights, transactions & adjudication history, and diversion records, all on that one page. On this site: the district’s full legal picture →

Structures it shares court cases with

This structure was a party to 2 court cases that also touched 4 other structures — changes of water right, augmentation plans, exchanges. Being parties to the same case does not by itself mean water moved between them; which way it ran, and how much, is in the decree.

How good is our record of it?

Grade C (6/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.