← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

THOMPSON WEIMER 1-7012

Structure dossier · WDID 0108623 · 2 · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:52 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1884-04-0762nd most senior of the 7705 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: NAILL WELL 019604-F (1884-04-07). Immediately behind: TWAMORE FARMS 1-13309 (1884-04-07).

Decreed rights (4)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
12516.01884-04-071895-11-21 0.00.0 CIRR
14185.01888-11-011895-11-21 0.00.0 CIRR
30770.01934-03-311972-12-31 3.050.0 CIRR
55969.02003-03-282003-12-31 0.03.342 CAUG

Recorded use (last 10 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 86 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 19 AF — 22% of that, and 1st lowest of the 10 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2012 91 7th lowest of 10 · 106% of median 36 5.2
2013 135 8th lowest of 10 · 157% of median 41 4.3
2014 63 4th lowest of 10 · 73% of median 15 5.2
2015 42 2nd lowest of 10 · 49% of median 24 2.8
2018 85 5th lowest of 10 · 99% of median 25 3.8
2019 60 3rd lowest of 10 · 70% of median 18 3.6
2020 384 10th lowest of 10 · 446% of median 46 7.6
2021 87 6th lowest of 10 · 101% of median 29 3.2
2022 274 9th lowest of 10 · 319% of median 98 3.9
2024 19 1st lowest of 10 · 22% of median 15 3.4

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 4 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 347 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 13% of the irrigation seasons in 2012-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.