Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
WEISBART WELL 1-8550
Structure dossier · WDID 0108867 · 2 · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 00:21 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1884-04-07 — 65th most senior of the 7705 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: TWAMORE FARMS 2-13310 (1884-04-07). Immediately behind: WHITNEY WELL 1-R14651-RF (1884-04-07).
Decreed rights (5)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12516.0 | 1884-04-07 | 1895-11-21 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 14185.0 | 1888-11-01 | 1895-11-21 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 38480.0 | 1955-05-10 | 1972-12-31 | 4.25 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 60265.0 | 2014-12-31 | 2014-12-31 | 0.0 | 4.25 | C | RCH | |
| 61049.0 | 2017-02-22 | 2017-12-31 | 0.0 | 4.2889 | C | AUG |
Legal record & documents
5 decreed actions on record across
3 court cases:
17CW3025, 14CW3167, W3174.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
17CW3025 | 1 | 2017-12-31 | S |
14CW3167 | 1 | 2014-12-31 | S |
W3174 | 3 | 1972-12-31 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 14 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 120 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 88 AF — 74% of that, and 6th lowest of the 14 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 206 | 12th lowest of 14 · 172% of median | 111 | 3.1 |
| 2012 | 137 | 11th lowest of 14 · 115% of median | 75 | 3.8 |
| 2013 | 132 | 9th lowest of 14 · 110% of median | 55 | 3.1 |
| 2014 | 133 | 10th lowest of 14 · 111% of median | 45 | 3.1 |
| 2015 | 35 | 2nd lowest of 14 · 29% of median | 19 | 2.1 |
| 2016 | 80 | 5th lowest of 14 · 67% of median | 36 | 1.7 |
| 2017 | 250 | 13th lowest of 14 · 209% of median | 94 | 1.9 |
| 2018 | 74 | 4th lowest of 14 · 62% of median | 40 | 1.5 |
| 2019 | 11 | 1st lowest of 14 · 9% of median | 6 | 1.4 |
| 2020 | 272 | 14th lowest of 14 · 228% of median | 66 | 8.9 |
| 2021 | 112 | 7th lowest of 14 · 94% of median | 48 | 2.0 |
| 2022 | 127 | 8th lowest of 14 · 106% of median | 79 | 2.0 |
| 2023 | 37 | 3rd lowest of 14 · 31% of median | 10 | 8.5 |
| 2024 | 88 | 6th lowest of 14 · 74% of median | 29 | 3.4 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 14 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 5 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 713 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 25% of the irrigation seasons in 2011-2024 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.