← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ZORTMAN WELL 1-5991

Structure dossier · WDID 0109100 · 2 · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:36 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1884-04-0768th most senior of the 7705 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WHITNEY WELL 2-R14652 (1884-04-07). Immediately behind: DEITRICH DITCH 3 (1885-04-02).

Decreed rights (4)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
12516.01884-04-071895-11-21 0.00.0 CIRR
14185.01888-11-011895-11-21 0.00.0 CIRR
30521.01933-07-251972-12-31 1.960.0 CIRR
55969.02003-03-282003-12-31 0.03.5648 CAUG

Recorded use (last 8 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 12 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 5 AF — 42% of that, and 1st lowest of the 8 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2013 9 4th lowest of 8 · 75% of median 5 1.9
2017 5 1st lowest of 8 · 42% of median 4 1.6
2018 16 6th lowest of 8 · 133% of median 14 1.6
2019 33 7th lowest of 8 · 275% of median 16 1.7
2020 208 8th lowest of 8 · 1733% of median 45 5.0
2021 15 5th lowest of 8 · 125% of median 8 1.8
2022 8 3rd lowest of 8 · 67% of median 6 1.4
2024 5 1st lowest of 8 · 42% of median 4 1.2

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 4 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record fragment 102 measured day(s) on file (under 180 -- a season, not a history)
record continuity unknown record too short to assess continuity (needs 2+ years of span and 180+ measured days)
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.