Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

OWW RECHARGE WELL 61336-F

Structure dossier · WDID 0110284 · 2 · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 02:13 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 2005-12-30 — 5037th most senior of the 7705 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CENTRAL AUG HEADGATE WELL GROUP (2005-12-30). Immediately behind: DAHMSTALTON POND (1913-12-31).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
56977.02005-12-302005-12-31 0.010000.0 AAUGCURRCH
56977.02005-12-302005-12-31 0.011.1401 CAUGCURRCH

Recorded use (last 12 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 800 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 461 AF — 58% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 12 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 1,171 11th lowest of 12 · 146% of median 135 6.0
2012 745 6th lowest of 12 · 93% of median 70 6.9
2014 1,117 10th lowest of 12 · 140% of median 115 6.1
2015 1,032 9th lowest of 12 · 129% of median 100 7.7
2016 431 1st lowest of 12 · 54% of median 61 7.8
2017 1,205 12th lowest of 12 · 150% of median 113 6.8
2018 606 4th lowest of 12 · 76% of median 66 6.7
2019 979 8th lowest of 12 · 122% of median 107 8.7
2020 682 5th lowest of 12 · 85% of median 72 6.2
2021 856 7th lowest of 12 · 107% of median 123 6.3
2023 599 3rd lowest of 12 · 75% of median 55 7.1
2024 461 2nd lowest of 12 · 58% of median 49 10.9

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 2 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1066 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 36% of the irrigation seasons in 2011-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.