Hydrohistorian
← My Water · All wells in this district · Print / save as PDF ·
· every download of this record carries its certificate idEQUUS WELL 2-39180-F
Structure dossier · WDID 0110335 · WELL · SOUTH PLATTE RIVER · DWR record
Source DWR administrative record · verify at DWR structure ↗ Source DWR administrative record · verify at DWR diversion records ↗ Source Our computation, scored against a reference · scored against DWR's call analysis, see /methods
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-09-10 16:10 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a39b541) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
In short
In a median year over its last 4 recorded years it diverts 603 acre-feet.
Assembled from the figures on this page — every number above is checked against them before it is shown (2 checked). The detail, with its method, is in the cards below.
Well permits on file (2)
DWR ties these well permits to WDID 0110335. A permit is the authorization to construct and use the well — not a water right, and separate from the decrees on this page (three things called “well”).
Download this structure
Everything on this page as data you can work with — and a README that makes it citable: the HydroBase snapshot it was built from, the build commit, what every column means, the method behind each derived figure, and that method's stated limits.
⇩ Full record (.zip) Print / save as PDF
Or one table at a time: rights.csv · annual_use.csv · curtailment_now.csv · court_cases.csv · co_parties.csv · call_climatology.csv
What is in the bundle
rights.csv— every decreed right, most senior first, with admin numbers, dates, amounts, uses and case numbers.annual_use.csv— recorded diversion by year, with releases accounted separately.curtailment_now.csv— each right's current priority status and how often it was out across analog years.court_cases.csv— the cases attached to its rights.co_parties.csv— the other structures that were parties to those cases. Not available anywhere else.call_climatology.csv— how often each right has been out of priority by week of season, with confidence intervals and the seasons the record could actually judge.README.txt— provenance, methods, limits, disclaimer, and links back to DWR's own records for verification.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it (well). Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: no decreed right on file, so there is no priority to test.
Water-court filings naming this structure
1 application in the monthly water-court resumes explicitly reference this WDID. The resume is the earliest public notice of a new claim (C.R.S. 37-92-302) — years before anything reaches the decree record below. Most applications name structures by name rather than WDID, so absence here is weak evidence of absence.
| Month | Case | What it asks | Oppose by | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11 | 2024CW3164 |
— | closed 2025-01-31 | CASE NUMBER 2024CW3164 APPLICATION FOR WATER RIGHTS AND FOR APPROVAL OF PLAN OF AUGMENTATION IN WELD COUNTY. 1. Name, Address and Telephone Number of Applicant: Equus Farms, Inc. c/o Mike Johnson 555 17th Street, Suite 2… |
Source: Judicial Branch combined monthly resumes (archive), indexed nightly; WDIDs attached only when a 7-digit token in the filing matches DWR’s structure inventory.
Recorded use (last 4 years on record)
Years far under the decreed amount? That gap has a name — paper water vs. wet water, explained on this structure.
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 603 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2011, came in at 551 AF — 91% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 4 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 550 | 1st lowest of 4 · 91% of median | 213 | 2.1 |
| 2009 | 902 | 4th lowest of 4 · 150% of median | 153 | 5.4 |
| 2010 | 655 | 3rd lowest of 4 · 109% of median | 187 | 3.8 |
| 2011 | 551 | 2nd lowest of 4 · 91% of median | 185 | 3.2 |
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | absent | no water rights cached for this WDID |
| diversion record | present | 738 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | continuous | 98% of the irrigation seasons in 2008-2011 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.
Hydrohistorian is free, with no ads — one server and a lot of public records. If it earns its keep, you can help keep it running.