Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
PLEASANT VALLEY LAKE CNL
Structure dossier · WDID 0300910 · 1 · CACHE LA POUDRE RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 23:03 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1861-06-01 — 5th most senior of the 2961 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: GREELEY FILTERS PIPELINE (1861-06-01). Immediately behind: LARIMER COUNTY DITCH (1861-06-01).
Decreed rights (28)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4170.0 | 1861-06-01 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 4262.0 | 1861-09-01 | 1882-04-11 | 10.97 | 0.0 | C | IRRRECFISDOMAUGWLD | |
| 5275.0 | 1864-06-10 | 1882-04-11 | 29.63 | 0.0 | C | IRRRECFISDOMAUGWLD | |
| 6026.0 | 1866-07-01 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 6483.0 | 1867-10-01 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 6727.0 | 1868-06-01 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 7092.0 | 1869-06-01 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 7184.0 | 1869-09-01 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 7761.0 | 1871-04-01 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 7953.0 | 1871-10-10 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 8218.0 | 1872-07-01 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 8236.0 | 1872-07-19 | 1882-04-11 | 16.5 | 0.0 | C | IRRDOM | |
| 8237.0 | 1872-07-20 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 8492.0 | 1873-04-01 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 8645.0 | 1873-09-01 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 9236.0 | 1875-04-15 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | MUN | |
| 10822.0 | 1879-08-18 | 1882-04-11 | 80.83 | 0.0 | C | IRRDOM | |
| 11003.0 | 1880-02-15 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 15716.0 | 1893-01-10 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | MUN | |
| 21392.0 | 1908-07-27 | 1922-04-22 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | MUN | |
| 35050.08218 | 1872-07-01 | 1953-09-10 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 35050.08492 | 1873-04-01 | 1953-09-10 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 35050.10736 | 1879-05-24 | 1953-09-10 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 35050.11003 | 1880-02-15 | 1953-09-10 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 46751.20669 | 1906-08-04 | 1978-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | MUN | |
| 52217.0 | 1992-12-18 | 1992-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 55152.0 | 2000-12-31 | 2000-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISDOMAUGWLD | |
| 59161.0 | 2011-12-23 | 2011-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN |
Legal record & documents
91 decreed actions on record across
6 court cases:
11CW0265, 05CW0323, 00CW0251, 92CW0129, CA0320, 02CW0328.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
11CW0265 | 12 | 2011-12-31 | S |
05CW0323 | 34 | 2005-12-31 | O, S |
00CW0251 | 1 | 2000-12-31 | S |
92CW0129 | 34 | 1992-12-31 | O, S |
CA0320 | 6 | 1882-04-11 | O |
02CW0328 | 4 | 1882-04-11 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 10,812 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 10,989 AF — 102% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 10,446 | 4th lowest of 15 · 97% of median | — | 299 | 50.0 |
| 2011 | 10,812 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | — | 335 | 46.0 |
| 2012 | 10,963 | 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median | — | 281 | 45.0 |
| 2013 | 9,987 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 92% of median | — | 192 | 53.0 |
| 2014 | 10,551 | 7th lowest of 15 · 98% of median | — | 356 | 46.0 |
| 2015 | 9,595 | 1st lowest of 15 · 89% of median | — | 346 | 43.3 |
| 2016 | 11,512 | 13th lowest of 15 · 106% of median | — | 366 | 55.7 |
| 2017 | 11,163 | 11th lowest of 15 · 103% of median | — | 365 | 55.6 |
| 2018 | 11,646 | 14th lowest of 15 · 108% of median | — | 365 | 71.8 |
| 2019 | 11,426 | 12th lowest of 15 · 106% of median | — | 365 | 56.3 |
| 2020 | 10,491 | 6th lowest of 15 · 97% of median | — | 337 | 46.5 |
| 2021 | 10,468 | 5th lowest of 15 · 97% of median | — | 365 | 57.1 |
| 2022 | 12,103 | 15th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | — | 365 | 50.8 |
| 2023 | 10,238 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 95% of median | — | 365 | 46.6 |
| 2024 | 10,989 | 10th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | — | 305 | 55.7 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 28 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 17910 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | continuous | 100% of the irrigation seasons in 1950-2024 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.