← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BOX ELDER DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 0300926 · 1 · CACHE LA POUDRE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:48 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1865-04-1070th most senior of the 2961 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CACHE LA PODR RES INLET CANAL (1865-04-10). Immediately behind: COY DITCH STATION (1865-04-10).

Decreed rights (13)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
5579.01865-04-101882-04-11 0.00.0 AMUNAUGCUR
5579.01865-04-101882-04-11 0.00.0 CMUNAUGCUR
5904.01866-03-011882-04-11 32.50.0 CSTOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG
6354.01867-05-251882-04-11 8.330.0 CSTOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG
6757.01868-07-011882-04-11 11.930.0 CSTOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG
50038.01986-12-311986-12-31 0.00.0 CALL
51864.512371990-04-131992-12-31 0.02.5 CIRRCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUGWLD
52732.01994-05-171994-12-31 0.00.0 CIRRCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUGWLD
56977.02005-12-302005-12-31 0.00.0 CAUGCURRCH
58074.568572005-09-012009-12-31 50.00.0 CAUGCURRCH
59161.02011-12-232011-12-31 0.00.0 CMUN
59983.02014-03-242014-12-31 11.294.71 CMUN
60476.02015-07-302014-12-31 0.00.0 CAUGCUR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 9,088 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 8,562 AF — 94% of that, and 5th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 8,004 2nd lowest of 15 · 88% of median 227 43.0
2011 8,287 4th lowest of 15 · 91% of median 224 44.2
2012 10,812 12th lowest of 15 · 119% of median 225 52.2
2013 5,977 1st lowest of 15 · 66% of median 167 80.0
2014 17,010 15th lowest of 15 · 187% of median 222 88.6
2015 8,258 3rd lowest of 15 · 91% of median 215 37.3
2016 8,765 7th lowest of 15 · 96% of median 206 46.4
2017 8,733 6th lowest of 15 · 96% of median 206 46.4
2018 10,589 11th lowest of 15 · 116% of median 206 47.7
2019 12,878 14th lowest of 15 · 142% of median 245 44.2
2020 10,138 10th lowest of 15 · 112% of median 205 38.7
2021 10,942 13th lowest of 15 · 120% of median 206 46.2
2022 9,559 9th lowest of 15 · 105% of median 206 44.9
2023 9,088 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 199 58.4
2024 8,562 5th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 230 51.1

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.