← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

NORTH POUDRE RES 2

Structure dossier · WDID 0303697 · 3 · NORTH FORK CACHE LA POUD · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:09 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1861-06-1036th most senior of the 2961 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: NORTH POUDRE RES 1 (1861-06-10). Immediately behind: NORTH POUDRE RES 3 (1861-06-10).

Decreed rights (14)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
4179.01861-06-101882-04-11 0.00.0 CMUN
4443.01862-03-011882-04-11 0.00.0 CSTOALL
5372.01864-09-151882-04-11 0.00.0 CSTOALL
6649.01868-03-151882-04-11 0.00.0 CSTOALL
7599.01870-10-211882-04-11 0.00.0 CMUN
8480.01873-03-201882-04-11 0.00.0 CSTOALL
8659.01873-09-151882-04-11 0.00.0 CMUN
10318.01878-04-011882-04-11 0.00.0 CSTOALL
10788.01879-07-151882-04-11 0.00.0 CMUN
11438.01881-04-251882-04-11 0.00.0 CSTOALL
14661.01890-02-201904-12-09 3328.00.0 AIRR
18840.01901-08-011904-12-09 551.00.0 AIRR
23646.01914-09-281945-12-18 0.00.0 CSTOALL
35050.262971921-12-311953-09-10 1377.00.0 AIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,229 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2010, came in at 1,411 AF — 115% of that, and 4th lowest of the 5 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
1996 no recorded volume 2,237 0
1997 no recorded volume 1,567 0
1998 no recorded volume 1,526 0
1999 no recorded volume 1,358 0
2000 no recorded volume 1,748 0
2001 no recorded volume 1,769 0
2002 no recorded volume 1,614 0
2003 no recorded volume 1,650 0
2004 no recorded volume 793 0
2005 no recorded volume 2,616 0
2006 50 1st lowest of 5 · 4% of median 904 31 0.8
2007 1,411 4th lowest of 5 · 115% of median 122 9.7
2008 288 2nd lowest of 5 · 23% of median 1,346 61 2.7
2009 1,229 3rd lowest of 5 · 100% of median 1,610 183 14.1
2010 1,411 4th lowest of 5 · 115% of median 1,662 156 8.7

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.