← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

NORTH POUDRE RES 3

Structure dossier · WDID 0303702 · 3 · NORTH FORK CACHE LA POUD · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:57 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1861-06-1037th most senior of the 2961 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: NORTH POUDRE RES 2 (1861-06-10). Immediately behind: NORTH POUDRE RES 4 (1861-06-10).

Decreed rights (15)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
4179.01861-06-101882-04-11 0.00.0 CMUN
4443.01862-03-011882-04-11 0.00.0 CSTOALL
5372.01864-09-151882-04-11 0.00.0 CSTOALL
6649.01868-03-151882-04-11 0.00.0 CSTOALL
7599.01870-10-211882-04-11 0.00.0 CMUN
8480.01873-03-201882-04-11 0.00.0 CSTOALL
8659.01873-09-151882-04-11 0.00.0 CMUN
10318.01878-04-011882-04-11 0.00.0 CSTOALL
10788.01879-07-151882-04-11 0.00.0 CMUN
11438.01881-04-251882-04-11 0.00.0 CSTOALL
12693.01884-10-011904-12-09 1574.00.0 AIRR
15466.01892-05-051904-12-09 855.00.0 AIRR
20066.200281904-11-011922-04-22 417.00.0 AIRR
23646.01914-09-281945-12-18 0.00.0 CSTOALL
35050.262971921-12-311953-09-10 2846.00.0 AIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 502 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2010, came in at 535 AF — 107% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 2 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
1996 no recorded volume 1,346 0
1997 no recorded volume 1,528 0
1998 no recorded volume 1,031 0
1999 no recorded volume 727 0
2000 no recorded volume 1,258 0
2001 no recorded volume 1,642 0
2002 no recorded volume 1,303 0
2003 no recorded volume 1,378 0
2004 no recorded volume 2,098 0
2005 no recorded volume 187 0
2006 no recorded volume 1,137 0
2007 no recorded volume 916 0
2008 no recorded volume 731 0
2009 469 1st lowest of 2 · 93% of median 548 153 5.0
2010 535 2nd lowest of 2 · 107% of median 366 95 5.7

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 15 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2171 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 27% of the irrigation seasons in 1972-2010 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.