← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

WATER SUPPLY & STORAGE RES 1

Structure dossier · WDID 0303736 · 3 · CACHE LA POUDRE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:16 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1861-06-1044th most senior of the 2961 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CURTIS LAKE RES (1861-06-10). Immediately behind: WATER SUPPLY & STORAGE RES 4 (1861-06-10).

Decreed rights (12)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
4179.01861-06-101882-04-11 0.00.0 CMUN
4443.01862-03-011882-04-11 0.00.0 CSTOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG
5372.01864-09-151882-04-11 0.00.0 CSTOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG
6649.01868-03-151882-04-11 0.00.0 CSTOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG
7599.01870-10-211882-04-11 0.00.0 CMUN
8480.01873-03-201882-04-11 0.00.0 CSTOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG
8659.01873-09-151882-04-11 0.00.0 CMUN
10318.01878-04-011882-04-11 0.00.0 CSTOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG
10788.01879-07-151882-04-11 0.00.0 CMUN
11438.01881-04-251882-04-11 0.00.0 CSTOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG
15219.01891-09-011904-12-09 4726.00.0 ASTOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG
23646.01914-09-281945-12-18 0.00.0 CSTOALL

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 786 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2010, came in at 613 AF — 78% of that, and 1st lowest of the 2 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
1996 no recorded volume 677 0
1997 no recorded volume 300 0
1998 no recorded volume 621 0
1999 no recorded volume 471 0
2000 no recorded volume 400 0
2001 no recorded volume 1,376 0
2002 no recorded volume 717 0
2003 no recorded volume 479 0
2004 no recorded volume 528 0
2005 no recorded volume 1,791 0
2006 no recorded volume 444 0
2007 no recorded volume 1,492 0
2008 no recorded volume 843 0
2009 959 2nd lowest of 2 · 122% of median 823 153 11.5
2010 613 1st lowest of 2 · 78% of median 573 152 15.2

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.