← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

KLUVER RES

Structure dossier · WDID 0303740 · 3 · CACHE LA POUDRE RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:05 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1861-06-1046th most senior of the 2961 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WATER SUPPLY & STORAGE RES 4 (1861-06-10). Immediately behind: WATER SUPPLY & STORAGE RES 5 (1861-06-10).

Decreed rights (12)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
4179.01861-06-101882-04-11 0.00.0 CMUN
4443.01862-03-011882-04-11 0.00.0 CSTOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG
5372.01864-09-151882-04-11 0.00.0 CSTOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG
6649.01868-03-151882-04-11 0.00.0 CSTOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG
7599.01870-10-211882-04-11 0.00.0 CMUN
8480.01873-03-201882-04-11 0.00.0 CSTOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG
8659.01873-09-151882-04-11 0.00.0 CMUN
10318.01878-04-011882-04-11 0.00.0 CSTOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG
10788.01879-07-151882-04-11 0.00.0 CMUN
11438.01881-04-251882-04-11 0.00.0 CSTOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG
23646.01914-09-281945-12-18 0.00.0 CSTOALL
26409.2241911-05-011945-12-18 1562.00.0 ASTOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 428 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2010, came in at 197 AF — 46% of that, and 1st lowest of the 2 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
1996 no recorded volume 410 0
1997 no recorded volume 360 0
1998 no recorded volume 569 0
1999 no recorded volume 187 0
2000 no recorded volume 508 0
2001 no recorded volume 532 0
2002 no recorded volume 104 0
2003 no recorded volume 287 0
2004 no recorded volume 372 0
2005 no recorded volume 285 0
2006 no recorded volume 375 0
2007 no recorded volume 104 0
2008 no recorded volume 381 0
2009 659 2nd lowest of 2 · 154% of median 192 93 9.3
2010 197 1st lowest of 2 · 46% of median 839 35 21.2

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 12 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1925 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 24% of the irrigation seasons in 1973-2010 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.