Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
LINDENMEIER LAKE
Structure dossier · WDID 0303743 · 3 · CACHE LA POUDRE RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 01:50 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1861-06-10 — 48th most senior of the 2961 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WATER SUPPLY & STORAGE RES 5 (1861-06-10). Immediately behind: BLACK HOLLOW RES (1861-06-10).
Decreed rights (12)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4179.0 | 1861-06-10 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 4443.0 | 1862-03-01 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG | |
| 5372.0 | 1864-09-15 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG | |
| 6649.0 | 1868-03-15 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG | |
| 7599.0 | 1870-10-21 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 8480.0 | 1873-03-20 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG | |
| 8659.0 | 1873-09-15 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 10318.0 | 1878-04-01 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG | |
| 10788.0 | 1879-07-15 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 11438.0 | 1881-04-25 | 1882-04-11 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG | |
| 15387.0 | 1892-02-16 | 1904-12-09 | 608.0 | 0.0 | A | STOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG | |
| 23646.0 | 1914-09-28 | 1945-12-18 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | STOALL |
Legal record & documents
41 decreed actions on record across
10 court cases:
18CW3076, 17CW3057, 03CW0421, W7821, CA1591, 87CW0332, 11CW0265, 07CW0190, 03CW0422, 08CW0277.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
18CW3076 | 10 | 1945-12-18 | O, S |
17CW3057 | 10 | 1945-12-18 | O, S |
03CW0421 | 7 | 1945-12-18 | O |
W7821 | 1 | 1904-12-09 | O |
CA1591 | 1 | 1904-12-09 | O |
87CW0332 | 2 | 1904-12-09 | O |
11CW0265 | 2 | 1904-12-09 | O |
07CW0190 | 2 | 1904-12-09 | O |
03CW0422 | 2 | 1904-12-09 | O |
08CW0277 | 4 | 1882-04-11 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 134 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2011, came in at 469 AF — 349% of that, and 7th lowest of the 8 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | 72 | 3rd lowest of 8 · 54% of median | 188 | 42 | 6.0 |
| 2000 | 142 | 5th lowest of 8 · 106% of median | 189 | 12 | 12.3 |
| 2001 | — | no recorded volume | 14 | 0 | — |
| 2002 | — | no recorded volume | 149 | 0 | — |
| 2003 | 481 | 8th lowest of 8 · 358% of median | 457 | 42 | 9.6 |
| 2004 | — | no recorded volume | 98 | 0 | — |
| 2005 | — | no recorded volume | 297 | 0 | — |
| 2006 | — | no recorded volume | 191 | 0 | — |
| 2007 | 22 | 2nd lowest of 8 · 16% of median | 199 | 60 | 0.3 |
| 2008 | 3 | 1st lowest of 8 · 2% of median | 194 | 61 | 0.0 |
| 2009 | 217 | 6th lowest of 8 · 161% of median | 159 | 104 | 5.1 |
| 2010 | 127 | 4th lowest of 8 · 94% of median | 163 | 89 | 2.2 |
| 2011 | 469 | 7th lowest of 8 · 349% of median | 352 | 165 | 8.2 |
| 2023 | — | no recorded volume | 1,140 | 0 | — |
| 2024 | — | no recorded volume | 278 | 0 | — |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 8 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 12 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 794 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 7% of the irrigation seasons in 1972-2024 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.