← My Water · Print / save as PDF
LARIMER CO IRR MFG D
Structure dossier · WDID 0400529 · 1 · BIG THOMPSON RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 00:58 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1873-10-25 — 36th most senior of the 1296 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: EVANSTOWN DITCH (1871-04-20). Immediately behind: KIRCHNER DITCH (1874-06-01).
Decreed rights (6)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8699.0 | 1873-10-25 | 1883-05-28 | 23.7167 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUG | |
| 50038.43617 | 1969-06-02 | 1987-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUGPWR | |
| 52960.43617 | 1969-06-02 | 1995-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUGPWR | |
| 53325.5293 | 1994-12-01 | 1996-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUNALL | |
| 54421.43617 | 1969-06-02 | 1999-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUGPWR | |
| 55881.0 | 2002-12-30 | 2002-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN |
Legal record & documents
56 decreed actions on record across
15 court cases:
03CW0314, 02CW0394, 02CW0393, 99CW0235, 96CW0958, 10CW0280, 95CW0042, 96CW0031, 87CW0329, 97CW0077 and 5 more below.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
03CW0314 | 6 | 2003-12-31 | O, S |
02CW0394 | 8 | 2002-12-31 | S |
02CW0393 | 13 | 2002-12-31 | S |
99CW0235 | 4 | 1999-12-31 | O, S |
96CW0958 | 4 | 1996-12-31 | O, S |
10CW0280 | 2 | 1996-12-31 | S |
95CW0042 | 4 | 1995-12-31 | O, S |
96CW0031 | 1 | 1987-12-31 | S |
87CW0329 | 4 | 1987-12-31 | O, S |
97CW0077 | 2 | 1883-05-28 | O |
82CW0202 | 1 | 1883-05-28 | O |
18CW3042 | 2 | 1883-05-28 | O |
05/28/1883 | 2 | 1883-05-28 | O |
03CW0354 | 1 | 1883-05-28 | O |
02CW0392 | 2 | 1883-05-28 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
How good is our record of it?
Grade C (6/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 6 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | absent | no diversion records cached |
| record continuity | unknown | no record span to measure against |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.