Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
LOVELAND READY MIX P 2
Structure dossier · WDID 0403715 · 3 · BIG THOMPSON RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 23:23 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1998-11-13 — 1166th most senior of the 1296 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: LOVELAND READY MIX P 1 (1998-11-13). Immediately behind: YAKUTAT SPRING (1908-12-31).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54373.0 | 1998-11-13 | 1998-12-31 | 117.07 | 112.93 | A | RECFISAUGWLD |
Legal record & documents
2 decreed actions on record across
2 court cases:
98CW0431, 13CW3137.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
98CW0431 | 1 | 1998-12-31 | S |
13CW3137 | 1 | 1998-12-31 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 12 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 81 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2023, came in at 13 AF — 16% of that, and 1st lowest of the 9 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 136 | 7th lowest of 9 · 168% of median | — | 46 | 3.3 |
| 2009 | 152 | 8th lowest of 9 · 188% of median | 39 | 20 | 4.9 |
| 2011 | 211 | 9th lowest of 9 · 260% of median | — | 45 | 8.7 |
| 2012 | 32 | 2nd lowest of 9 · 40% of median | — | 18 | 2.5 |
| 2015 | — | no recorded volume | 22 | 0 | — |
| 2016 | — | no recorded volume | 169 | 0 | — |
| 2017 | 69 | 3rd lowest of 9 · 85% of median | 7 | 28 | 4.7 |
| 2018 | 91 | 6th lowest of 9 · 112% of median | 27 | 16 | 7.7 |
| 2019 | — | no recorded volume | 105 | 0 | — |
| 2020 | 81 | 5th lowest of 9 · 100% of median | 52 | 42 | 3.4 |
| 2021 | 73 | 4th lowest of 9 · 90% of median | — | 47 | 2.8 |
| 2023 | 13 | 1st lowest of 9 · 16% of median | — | 4 | 3.2 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 9 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 1 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 266 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 8% of the irrigation seasons in 2008-2023 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.