← My Water · Print / save as PDF
HERTHA RES
Structure dossier · WDID 0404166 · 3 · DRY CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:12 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1909-11-09 — 113th most senior of the 1296 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HUPPE DITCH (1909-07-12). Immediately behind: GLACIER RES NO 1 (1911-09-15).
Decreed rights (4)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24286.21862 | 1909-11-09 | 1931-04-01 | 61.0 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRMUNFISAUGCURWLD | |
| 24286.21862 | 1909-11-09 | 1931-04-01 | 593.0286 | 0.0 | A | STOIRRMUNFISAUGCURWLD | |
| 27531.0 | 1925-05-18 | 1931-04-01 | 1543.2736 | 0.0 | A | STOIRRMUNFISAUGCURWLD | |
| 29675.26828 | 1923-06-15 | 1939-11-14 | 593.0 | 0.0 | A | STOIRRMUNFISAUGCURWLD |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 332 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 385 AF — 116% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 480 | 12th lowest of 15 · 145% of median | — | 22 | 15.0 |
| 2005 | 318 | 6th lowest of 15 · 96% of median | — | 20 | 15.0 |
| 2006 | 647 | 14th lowest of 15 · 195% of median | — | 35 | 10.0 |
| 2007 | 321 | 7th lowest of 15 · 97% of median | — | 10 | 20.0 |
| 2008 | 332 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | — | 10 | 23.6 |
| 2010 | 166 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 50% of median | — | 10 | 11.8 |
| 2011 | 164 | 1st lowest of 15 · 49% of median | — | 9 | 12.5 |
| 2012 | 164 | 1st lowest of 15 · 49% of median | — | 14 | 7.0 |
| 2016 | 235 | 5th lowest of 15 · 71% of median | — | 11 | 15.0 |
| 2019 | 511 | 13th lowest of 15 · 154% of median | — | 19 | 15.0 |
| 2020 | 1,563 | 15th lowest of 15 · 471% of median | — | 228 | 16.0 |
| 2021 | 206 | 4th lowest of 15 · 62% of median | 1,870 | 14 | 8.0 |
| 2022 | 443 | 11th lowest of 15 · 133% of median | 1,252 | 25 | 12.0 |
| 2023 | 343 | 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median | 1,789 | 23 | 10.0 |
| 2024 | 385 | 10th lowest of 15 · 116% of median | 1,605 | 30 | 8.0 |
Call-derived yield: senior right divertible 9.8% of a median season / 0.0% dry-year.
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.