← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

GOSS PRIVATE DITCH 1

Structure dossier · WDID 0500534 · 1 · SAINT VRAIN CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 01:48 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1865-06-3081st most senior of the 1289 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BAKER WEESE DITCH (1865-06-01). Immediately behind: GOSS PRIVATE DITCH 2 (1865-06-30).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
5660.01865-06-301882-06-02 25.110.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 424 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 560 AF — 132% of that, and 13th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 227 4th lowest of 15 · 54% of median 34 7.1
2011 510 11th lowest of 15 · 120% of median 46 9.1
2012 490 10th lowest of 15 · 116% of median 81 8.3
2013 250 5th lowest of 15 · 59% of median 25 7.5
2014 224 3rd lowest of 15 · 53% of median 27 7.4
2015 102 1st lowest of 15 · 24% of median 18 4.8
2016 220 2nd lowest of 15 · 52% of median 25 8.9
2017 611 15th lowest of 15 · 144% of median 35 13.4
2018 424 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 35 12.2
2019 374 7th lowest of 15 · 88% of median 27 11.7
2020 589 14th lowest of 15 · 139% of median 48 12.5
2021 437 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 31 10.1
2022 285 6th lowest of 15 · 67% of median 18 12.0
2023 527 12th lowest of 15 · 124% of median 30 12.1
2024 560 13th lowest of 15 · 132% of median 44 11.7

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3904 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 25% of the irrigation seasons in 1952-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.