← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

COFFIN DAVIS DRY CREEK DIVERSION

Structure dossier · WDID 0500831 · 1 · DRY CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:53 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1866-06-0186th most senior of the 1289 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: COFFIN DAVIS DITCH (1866-06-01). Immediately behind: LONGMONT NORTH PIPELINE ALT PT A (1866-06-01).

Decreed rights (4)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
5996.01866-06-011882-06-02 0.00.0 AIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMSTKAUG
5996.01866-06-011882-06-02 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMSTKAUG
58430.02009-12-222009-12-31 0.017.3 CIRRRECFIS
62798.02021-12-072021-12-31 0.020.0 CAUGCUR

Recorded use (last 8 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 393 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 436 AF — 111% of that, and 6th lowest of the 8 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2015 403 5th lowest of 8 · 102% of median 112 4.2
2016 285 2nd lowest of 8 · 72% of median 110 2.4
2017 361 3rd lowest of 8 · 92% of median 157 4.5
2018 383 4th lowest of 8 · 98% of median 164 3.5
2019 120 1st lowest of 8 · 30% of median 37 2.3
2022 488 8th lowest of 8 · 124% of median 124 2.0
2023 440 7th lowest of 8 · 112% of median 112 2.0
2024 436 6th lowest of 8 · 111% of median 110 2.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 4 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 926 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 46% of the irrigation seasons in 2015-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.