Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
SHORES LAKES
Structure dossier · WDID 0503900 · 3 · GODDING HOLLOW · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:23 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 2000-05-31 — 1220th most senior of the 1289 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: RURAL DITCH INFLOW DIVR (1959-06-01). Immediately behind: IMEL SPRING (1862-05-31).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54938.0 | 2000-05-31 | 2000-12-31 | 3528.36 | 3471.64 | A | RECFISAUGWLD | |
| 55797.0 | 2002-10-07 | 2000-12-31 | 0.0 | 1000.0 | A | RECFISAUGWLD |
Recorded use (last 9 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 770 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 155 AF — 20% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 9 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 220 | 3rd lowest of 9 · 29% of median | — | 19 | 20.0 |
| 2017 | 3,027 | 9th lowest of 9 · 393% of median | — | 182 | 35.0 |
| 2018 | 43 | 1st lowest of 9 · 6% of median | — | 3 | 10.3 |
| 2019 | 1,291 | 8th lowest of 9 · 168% of median | — | 71 | 39.2 |
| 2020 | 770 | 5th lowest of 9 · 100% of median | — | 46 | 21.0 |
| 2021 | 1,039 | 7th lowest of 9 · 135% of median | — | 63 | 26.9 |
| 2022 | 400 | 4th lowest of 9 · 52% of median | — | 46 | 7.0 |
| 2023 | 979 | 6th lowest of 9 · 127% of median | 308 | 40 | 32.8 |
| 2024 | 155 | 2nd lowest of 9 · 20% of median | 512 | 14 | 15.7 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.