Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
ELLIOTT POND NO 2
Structure dossier · WDID 0504487 · 3 · SAINT VRAIN CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 23:21 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1862-04-15 — 54th most senior of the 1289 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: ELLIOTT POND NO 3 (1862-04-15). Immediately behind: MONTGOMERY PRIVATE DITCH (1862-05-15).
Decreed rights (13)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4488.0 | 1862-04-15 | 1882-06-02 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUGPWR | |
| 4518.0 | 1862-05-15 | 1882-06-02 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUGPWR | |
| 4657.0 | 1862-10-01 | 1882-06-02 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUGPWR | |
| 4853.0 | 1863-04-15 | 1882-06-02 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUGPWR | |
| 5996.0 | 1866-06-01 | 1882-06-02 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | IRRMUN | |
| 6339.0 | 1867-05-10 | 1882-06-02 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | MUN | |
| 6339.0 | 1867-05-10 | 1882-06-02 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 7012.0 | 1869-03-13 | 1882-06-02 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | IRRMUN | |
| 7640.0 | 1870-12-01 | 1882-06-02 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | IRRMUN | |
| 8464.0 | 1873-03-04 | 1882-06-02 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | IRRMUN | |
| 48942.47055 | 1978-10-31 | 1984-12-31 | 61.0 | 0.0 | A | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUGPWR | |
| 50769.47042 | 1978-10-18 | 1989-12-31 | 42.0 | 0.0 | A | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUGPWR | |
| 50769.50582 | 1988-06-27 | 1989-12-31 | 103.0 | 0.0 | A | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUGPWR |
Legal record & documents
15 decreed actions on record across
7 court cases:
96CW0033, 89CW0073, 84CW0298A, 07CW0330, 01CW0188, 00CW0241, 00CW0240.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
96CW0033 | 3 | 1989-12-31 | S |
89CW0073 | 2 | 1989-12-31 | S |
84CW0298A | 1 | 1984-12-31 | S |
07CW0330 | 1 | 1882-06-02 | O |
01CW0188 | 4 | 1882-06-02 | O |
00CW0241 | 2 | 1882-06-02 | O |
00CW0240 | 2 | 1882-06-02 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 1 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 22 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1991, came in at 22 AF — 100% of that, and 1st lowest of the 1 year with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1991 | 22 | 1st lowest of 1 · 100% of median | 18 | 1.7 |
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 13 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | fragment | 18 measured day(s) on file (under 180 -- a season, not a history) |
| record continuity | unknown | record too short to assess continuity (needs 2+ years of span and 180+ measured days) |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.