Hydrohistorian
← My Water · All wells in this district · Print / save as PDF ·
CASTLE ROCK NT DEN WELL 68741-F
Structure dossier · WDID 0815181 · WELL · DENVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-09-05 07:16 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (e1cc9aa) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
In short
In a median year over its last 4 recorded years it diverts 92 acre-feet.
Assembled from the figures on this page — every number above is checked against them before it is shown (2 checked). The detail, with its method, is in the cards below.
Well permit on file (1)
DWR ties this well permit to WDID 0815181. A permit is the authorization to construct and use the well — not a water right, and separate from the decrees on this page (three things called “well”).
| Permit | Use | Status | Depth | Static level | Yield | Completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68741-F | Industrial, Municipal | Well Constructed | 1,720 ft | — | 260.0 gpm | 2010-03-13 |
Download this structure
Everything on this page as data you can work with — and a README that makes it citable: the HydroBase snapshot it was built from, the build commit, what every column means, the method behind each derived figure, and that method's stated limits.
⇩ Full record (.zip) Print / save as PDF
Or one table at a time: rights.csv · annual_use.csv · curtailment_now.csv · court_cases.csv · co_parties.csv · call_climatology.csv
What is in the bundle
rights.csv— every decreed right, most senior first, with admin numbers, dates, amounts, uses and case numbers.annual_use.csv— recorded diversion by year, with releases accounted separately.curtailment_now.csv— each right's current priority status and how often it was out across analog years.court_cases.csv— the cases attached to its rights.co_parties.csv— the other structures that were parties to those cases. Not available anywhere else.call_climatology.csv— how often each right has been out of priority by week of season, with confidence intervals and the seasons the record could actually judge.README.txt— provenance, methods, limits, disclaimer, and links back to DWR's own records for verification.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it (well). Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: no decreed right on file, so there is no priority to test.
Recorded use (last 4 years on record)
Years far under the decreed amount? That gap has a name — paper water vs. wet water, explained on this structure.
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 92 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2022, came in at 85 AF — 93% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 4 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 98 | 3rd lowest of 4 · 107% of median | 151 | 0.4 |
| 2020 | 68 | 1st lowest of 4 · 74% of median | 175 | 0.5 |
| 2021 | 154 | 4th lowest of 4 · 168% of median | 365 | 0.4 |
| 2022 | 85 | 2nd lowest of 4 · 93% of median | 304 | 0.4 |
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | absent | no water rights cached for this WDID |
| diversion record | present | 995 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | continuous | 100% of the irrigation seasons in 2019-2022 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.