← My Water · Print / save as PDF
BERGEN DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 0900535 · 1 · TURKEY CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:59 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1874-05-01 — 111th most senior of the 2058 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: TIGER LILY D SP 3 (1873-08-15). Immediately behind: 0903687 (1874-05-01).
Decreed rights (4)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8887.0 | 1874-05-01 | 1884-02-04 | 5.04 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 10476.0 | 1878-09-06 | 1884-02-04 | 8.266 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 11591.0 | 1881-09-25 | 1884-02-04 | 1.6842 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 13081.0 | 1885-10-24 | 1935-09-24 | 53.76 | 0.0 | C | IRR |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 658 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 371 AF — 56% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 363 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 55% of median | — | 17 | 18.6 |
| 2011 | 971 | 13th lowest of 15 · 148% of median | — | 86 | 18.6 |
| 2012 | 658 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | — | 63 | 15.5 |
| 2013 | 858 | 11th lowest of 15 · 130% of median | — | 51 | 25.9 |
| 2014 | 302 | 1st lowest of 15 · 46% of median | — | 29 | 16.0 |
| 2015 | 458 | 4th lowest of 15 · 70% of median | — | 20 | 16.0 |
| 2016 | 1,099 | 14th lowest of 15 · 167% of median | — | 54 | 17.5 |
| 2017 | 1,929 | 15th lowest of 15 · 293% of median | — | 123 | 16.0 |
| 2018 | 630 | 7th lowest of 15 · 96% of median | — | 68 | 15.5 |
| 2019 | 717 | 9th lowest of 15 · 109% of median | — | 48 | 11.2 |
| 2020 | 577 | 5th lowest of 15 · 88% of median | — | 38 | 16.5 |
| 2021 | 879 | 12th lowest of 15 · 134% of median | — | 51 | 12.0 |
| 2022 | 794 | 10th lowest of 15 · 121% of median | — | 65 | 13.9 |
| 2023 | 577 | 5th lowest of 15 · 88% of median | — | 51 | 16.8 |
| 2024 | 371 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 56% of median | — | 27 | 13.5 |
Call-derived yield: senior right divertible 58.0% of a median season / 16.8% dry-year.
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.