← My Water · Print / save as PDF
MORRISON QUARRY RES 2
Structure dossier · WDID 0903317 · 3 · STRAIN GULCH · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 00:38 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1861-12-01 — 26th most senior of the 2058 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: EVERGREEN WEST RES 3 (1861-12-01). Immediately behind: KING-MURPHY RES (1861-12-01).
Decreed rights (12)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4353.0 | 1861-12-01 | 1884-02-04 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 4362.0 | 1861-12-10 | 1884-02-04 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUGPWR | |
| 4627.0 | 1862-09-01 | 1884-02-04 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUGPWR | |
| 5417.0 | 1864-10-30 | 1884-02-04 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 5553.0 | 1865-03-15 | 1884-02-04 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUGPWR | |
| 5570.0 | 1865-04-01 | 1884-02-04 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | MUN | |
| 9627.0 | 1876-05-10 | 1884-02-04 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | IRRCOMIND | |
| 12453.11049 | 1880-04-01 | 1935-09-24 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUGPWR | |
| 12453.12121 | 1883-03-09 | 1935-09-24 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | IRRCOMIND | |
| 12453.12144 | 1883-04-01 | 1935-09-24 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMAUGPWR | |
| 52960.43955 | 1970-05-06 | 1995-12-31 | 747.944 | 2252.056 | A | ALL | |
| 54421.52899 | 1994-10-31 | 1999-12-31 | 0.0 | 3000.0 | A | MUNALL |
Legal record & documents
14 decreed actions on record across
7 court cases:
99CW0225, 95CW0126, 19CW3256, 12CW0100, 94CW0150, 11CW0294, 09CW0033.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
99CW0225 | 1 | 1999-12-31 | S |
95CW0126 | 1 | 1995-12-31 | S |
19CW3256 | 1 | 1995-12-31 | S |
12CW0100 | 1 | 1995-12-31 | S |
94CW0150 | 5 | 1935-09-24 | O, S |
11CW0294 | 2 | 1935-09-24 | O, S |
09CW0033 | 3 | 1884-02-04 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 1 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 53 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2019, came in at 53 AF — 100% of that, and 1st lowest of the 1 year with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 53 | 1st lowest of 1 · 100% of median | 19 | 1.9 |
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 12 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | fragment | 19 measured day(s) on file (under 180 -- a season, not a history) |
| record continuity | unknown | record too short to assess continuity (needs 2+ years of span and 180+ measured days) |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.