← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF  · 

PATRICK RES

Structure dossier · WDID 0904314 · 3 · BEAR CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-31 16:20 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (6a2f1f5) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

In short

In a median year over its last 11 recorded years it diverts 333 acre-feet. That use is falling by about 79.5 acre-feet a year over 11 years (p=0.008123423304273514).

Assembled from the figures on this page — every number above is checked against them before it is shown (5 checked). The detail, with its method, is in the cards below.

Download this structure

Everything on this page as data you can work with — and a README that makes it citable: the HydroBase snapshot it was built from, the build commit, what every column means, the method behind each derived figure, and that method's stated limits.

⇩ Full record (.zip) Print / save as PDF

Or one table at a time: rights.csv · annual_use.csv · curtailment_now.csv · court_cases.csv · co_parties.csv · call_climatology.csv

What is in the bundle
  • rights.csv — every decreed right, most senior first, with admin numbers, dates, amounts, uses and case numbers.
  • annual_use.csv — recorded diversion by year, with releases accounted separately.
  • curtailment_now.csv — each right's current priority status and how often it was out across analog years.
  • court_cases.csv — the cases attached to its rights.
  • co_parties.csv — the other structures that were parties to those cases. Not available anywhere else.
  • call_climatology.csv — how often each right has been out of priority by week of season, with confidence intervals and the seasons the record could actually judge.
  • README.txt — provenance, methods, limits, disclaimer, and links back to DWR's own records for verification.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it (storage). Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: no decreed right on file, so there is no priority to test.

Recorded use (last 12 years on record)

Years far under the decreed amount? That gap has a name — paper water vs. wet water, explained on this structure.

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 333 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1987, came in at 18 AF — 5% of that, and 1st lowest of the 11 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
1976 333 6th lowest of 11 · 100% of median 63 3.0
1977 958 11th lowest of 11 · 288% of median 153 10.0
1978 873 10th lowest of 11 · 262% of median 137 11.0
1979 752 9th lowest of 11 · 226% of median 74 11.0
1980 407 7th lowest of 11 · 122% of median 47 5.0
1981 450 8th lowest of 11 · 135% of median 60 8.0
1982 248 4th lowest of 11 · 74% of median 52 6.0
1983 60 2nd lowest of 11 · 18% of median 11 3.0
1984 137 3rd lowest of 11 · 41% of median 24 3.0
1986 315 5th lowest of 11 · 95% of median 40 6.0
1987 18 1st lowest of 11 · 5% of median 10 1.0
1988 no recorded volume 111 0

How good is our record of it?

Grade C (5/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights absent no water rights cached for this WDID
diversion record present 671 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 12% of the irrigation seasons in 1976-2002 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.