Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
PANCOST DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 1100679 · 1 · NORTH COTTONWOOD CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:27 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1887-05-10 — 230th most senior of the 1489 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 1100620 (1887-05-01). Immediately behind: BOB BERRY DITCH (1887-06-15).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13644.0 | 1887-05-10 | 1890-06-19 | 2.8 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 160 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 17 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2022, came in at 17 AF — 100% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | 470 | 15th lowest of 15 · 2765% of median | 53 | 6.2 |
| 1999 | 348 | 14th lowest of 15 · 2047% of median | 83 | 2.7 |
| 2000 | 50 | 10th lowest of 15 · 294% of median | 15 | 2.1 |
| 2001 | 56 | 11th lowest of 15 · 329% of median | 51 | 0.6 |
| 2002 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 6 | 0.0 |
| 2004 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2005 | 78 | 12th lowest of 15 · 459% of median | 16 | 2.8 |
| 2006 | 47 | 9th lowest of 15 · 276% of median | 17 | 2.8 |
| 2011 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 3 | 0.0 |
| 2012 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 12 | 0.0 |
| 2013 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 12 | 0.0 |
| 2014 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 10 | 0.0 |
| 2017 | 162 | 13th lowest of 15 · 953% of median | 153 | 2.5 |
| 2021 | 17 | 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 11 | 2.8 |
| 2022 | 17 | 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 11 | 2.8 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.