← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

THOMPSON & DERRY DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 1100767 · 1 · BOX CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:48 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1881-05-01336th most senior of the 1489 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: GLIVAR BROTHERS WELL (1916-05-24). Immediately behind: MCDONALD DITCH (1881-05-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
24304.114441881-05-011917-01-15 3.360.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 586 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2021, came in at 576 AF — 98% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2007 817 15th lowest of 15 · 139% of median 143 3.4
2008 760 12th lowest of 15 · 130% of median 131 4.0
2009 131 1st lowest of 15 · 22% of median 30 3.3
2010 777 14th lowest of 15 · 133% of median 128 3.3
2011 747 11th lowest of 15 · 128% of median 123 3.3
2012 564 6th lowest of 15 · 96% of median 92 3.4
2013 601 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 107 3.4
2014 586 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 99 3.4
2015 537 3rd lowest of 15 · 92% of median 112 3.3
2016 692 10th lowest of 15 · 118% of median 121 3.4
2017 769 13th lowest of 15 · 131% of median 142 3.4
2018 360 2nd lowest of 15 · 61% of median 101 3.2
2019 553 5th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 113 3.4
2020 544 4th lowest of 15 · 93% of median 98 3.3
2021 576 7th lowest of 15 · 98% of median 128 3.4

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 3622 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 36% of the irrigation seasons in 1974-2021 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.