← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

COTTONWOOD IRRIGATING 2

Structure dossier · WDID 1100936 · 1 · COTTONWOOD CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:49 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1866-07-3143rd most senior of the 1489 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: COTTONWOOD IRRIGATING 1 (1866-07-31). Immediately behind: LUDWIG WELL NO 1 (1866-07-31).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
6056.01866-07-311890-06-19 1.20.0 CIRRMUN 15
8401.01872-12-311890-06-19 2.60.0 CIRRMUN 43

Recorded use (last 12 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 934 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2023, came in at 1,322 AF — 142% of that, and 10th lowest of the 11 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
1975 28 2nd lowest of 11 · 3% of median 6 3.5
1992 5 1st lowest of 11 · 0% of median 4 0.8
2009 no recorded volume 572 0
2014 103 3rd lowest of 11 · 11% of median 103 31 1.7
2015 490 4th lowest of 11 · 52% of median 490 199 1.8
2016 959 7th lowest of 11 · 103% of median 959 212 3.2
2017 962 8th lowest of 11 · 103% of median 962 183 3.4
2018 1,636 11th lowest of 11 · 175% of median 1,636 184 6.7
2019 922 5th lowest of 11 · 99% of median 922 154 3.9
2020 934 6th lowest of 11 · 100% of median 934 199 3.7
2022 1,320 9th lowest of 11 · 141% of median 1,320 185 3.8
2023 1,322 10th lowest of 11 · 142% of median 1,322 179 5.3

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.