← My Water · Print / save as PDF
O'HAVER RESERVOIR
Structure dossier · WDID 1103921 · 3 · GRAYS CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:58 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1869-04-30 — 66th most senior of the 1489 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MURRAY DITCH (1869-04-30). Immediately behind: MUNDLEIN DITCH NO 1 (1869-11-30).
Decreed rights (6)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7060.0 | 1869-04-30 | 1890-06-19 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | STOAUG | 28 |
| 48464.0 | 1982-09-09 | 1982-12-31 | 193.0 | 0.0 | A | IRRMUNINDRECAUG | |
| 48555.0 | 1982-12-09 | 1982-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | MUN | |
| 57610.0 | 2007-09-24 | 2007-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | STO | |
| 57610.0 | 2007-09-24 | 2007-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | STO | |
| 58401.0 | 2009-11-23 | 2009-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | STOMUN |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 19 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2023, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 30 | 11th lowest of 15 · 158% of median | — | 2 | 15.1 |
| 2009 | 31 | 12th lowest of 15 · 163% of median | — | 13 | 3.8 |
| 2010 | 5 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 26% of median | — | 8 | 0.9 |
| 2011 | 50 | 13th lowest of 15 · 263% of median | — | 23 | 5.0 |
| 2012 | 74 | 15th lowest of 15 · 390% of median | 46 | 7 | 23.2 |
| 2013 | 9 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 47% of median | — | 67 | 3.0 |
| 2014 | 19 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | — | 304 | 0.1 |
| 2015 | 71 | 14th lowest of 15 · 374% of median | — | 214 | 0.8 |
| 2016 | 18 | 7th lowest of 15 · 95% of median | — | 200 | 0.2 |
| 2018 | 17 | 6th lowest of 15 · 90% of median | — | 175 | 0.1 |
| 2019 | 24 | 10th lowest of 15 · 126% of median | — | 142 | 0.1 |
| 2020 | 16 | 5th lowest of 15 · 84% of median | — | 149 | 1.3 |
| 2021 | 21 | 9th lowest of 15 · 110% of median | — | 245 | 0.1 |
| 2022 | 10 | 4th lowest of 15 · 53% of median | — | 365 | 0.1 |
| 2023 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | — | 304 | 0.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.