← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ROGERS DITCH NO 1

Structure dossier · WDID 1200501 · 1 · ARKANSAS RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:10 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1873-03-01139th most senior of the 1967 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HOAGG DITCH (1873-02-28). Immediately behind: BAKER DITCH (1873-03-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
8461.01873-03-011906-05-14 2.00.0 CIRR 112

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 40 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 25 AF — 62% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2009 221 15th lowest of 15 · 552% of median 116 2.0
2010 118 13th lowest of 15 · 295% of median 124 1.6
2011 125 14th lowest of 15 · 312% of median 138 1.5
2012 40 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 68 0.8
2013 59 10th lowest of 15 · 148% of median 49 1.3
2014 65 12th lowest of 15 · 162% of median 60 1.6
2015 62 11th lowest of 15 · 155% of median 35 2.0
2017 22 5th lowest of 15 · 55% of median 45 1.0
2018 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 8 0.0
2019 24 6th lowest of 15 · 60% of median 24 0.6
2020 19 4th lowest of 15 · 48% of median 40 1.1
2022 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2023 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 6 0.0
2024 48 9th lowest of 15 · 120% of median 25 1.0
2025 25 7th lowest of 15 · 62% of median 22 0.8

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.