← My Water · Print / save as PDF
MINNEQUA CANAL
Structure dossier · WDID 1200511 · 1 · ARKANSAS RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:18 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1861-07-22 — 20th most senior of the 1967 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CENT TELE & UTIL HGT #4 (1861-05-31). Immediately behind: UNION DITCH (1861-11-30).
Decreed rights (8)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4221.0 | 1861-07-22 | 1896-03-23 | 2.0 | 0.0 | C | IND | 3 |
| 5113.0 | 1863-12-31 | 1896-03-23 | 48.0 | 0.0 | C | IND | 9 |
| 5479.0 | 1864-12-31 | 1896-03-23 | 20.0 | 0.0 | C | IND | 12 |
| 11672.0 | 1881-12-15 | 1906-11-24 | 5.7 | 0.0 | C | IND | 260.8 |
| 14654.0 | 1890-02-13 | 1905-01-31 | 1.64 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 383.6 |
| 33797.29701 | 1931-04-27 | 1969-07-09 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNDOM | |
| 33797.3037 | 1933-02-24 | 1954-03-13 | 150.0 | 0.0 | C | IND | A-10 |
| 47720.0 | 1980-08-26 | 1980-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNDOMALL |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 55,034 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 45,394 AF — 82% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 91,486 | 14th lowest of 15 · 166% of median | 365 | 166.6 |
| 2012 | 93,241 | 15th lowest of 15 · 169% of median | 366 | 183.9 |
| 2013 | 55,824 | 11th lowest of 15 · 101% of median | 365 | 92.5 |
| 2014 | 53,731 | 6th lowest of 15 · 98% of median | 365 | 101.0 |
| 2015 | 46,512 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 84% of median | 365 | 91.2 |
| 2016 | 52,262 | 4th lowest of 15 · 95% of median | 366 | 108.0 |
| 2017 | 51,305 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 93% of median | 365 | 89.3 |
| 2018 | 56,866 | 13th lowest of 15 · 103% of median | 365 | 94.2 |
| 2019 | 54,393 | 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median | 365 | 93.4 |
| 2020 | 55,769 | 10th lowest of 15 · 101% of median | 366 | 100.3 |
| 2021 | 53,241 | 5th lowest of 15 · 97% of median | 365 | 95.5 |
| 2022 | 56,107 | 12th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 365 | 98.8 |
| 2023 | 55,580 | 9th lowest of 15 · 101% of median | 365 | 96.4 |
| 2024 | 55,034 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 366 | 98.0 |
| 2025 | 45,394 | 1st lowest of 15 · 82% of median | 304 | 96.7 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.