Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
WAFFORD DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 1200532 · 1 · FOURMILE CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 22:09 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1865-03-01 — 37th most senior of the 1967 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: ROYAL GORGE PUMP PLANT (1864-08-13). Immediately behind: GILLETTE WELL NO 2 (1865-04-01).
Decreed rights (4)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5539.0 | 1865-03-01 | 1894-02-03 | 2.36 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 22 |
| 5935.0 | 1866-04-01 | 1894-02-03 | 1.6 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 32 |
| 7396.0 | 1870-04-01 | 1894-02-03 | 0.16 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 51 |
| 13240.0 | 1886-04-01 | 1894-02-03 | 0.32 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 336 |
Legal record & documents
4 decreed actions on record across
1 court case:
02/03/1894.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
02/03/1894 | 4 | 1894-02-03 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 376 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1,221 AF — 325% of that, and 15th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 137 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 36% of median | 132 | 1.2 |
| 2012 | 348 | 7th lowest of 15 · 93% of median | 238 | 1.6 |
| 2013 | 313 | 4th lowest of 15 · 83% of median | 120 | 4.2 |
| 2014 | 127 | 1st lowest of 15 · 34% of median | 88 | 1.2 |
| 2015 | 376 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 118 | 3.7 |
| 2016 | 516 | 11th lowest of 15 · 137% of median | 105 | 4.2 |
| 2017 | 333 | 6th lowest of 15 · 89% of median | 88 | 3.6 |
| 2018 | 551 | 12th lowest of 15 · 146% of median | 170 | 2.5 |
| 2019 | 325 | 5th lowest of 15 · 86% of median | 89 | 4.5 |
| 2020 | 385 | 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 172 | 1.5 |
| 2021 | 161 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 43% of median | 68 | 2.3 |
| 2022 | 439 | 10th lowest of 15 · 117% of median | 122 | 2.6 |
| 2023 | 605 | 13th lowest of 15 · 161% of median | 170 | 2.1 |
| 2024 | 609 | 14th lowest of 15 · 162% of median | 174 | 2.4 |
| 2025 | 1,221 | 15th lowest of 15 · 325% of median | 189 | 4.4 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use is rising over its last 15 recorded years (+29 AF/yr, Mann-Kendall p=0.006).
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 4 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 17603 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | patchy | 72% of the irrigation seasons in 1911-2025 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.