← My Water · Print / save as PDF
REECE DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 1200621 · 1 · HARDSCRABBLE CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:59 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1869-05-01 — 65th most senior of the 1967 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 1869 DITCH (1869-04-30). Immediately behind: THOMAS JOHNSON DITCH (1869-05-31).
Decreed rights (6)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7061.0 | 1869-05-01 | 1894-02-03 | 1.125 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 44 |
| 7974.0 | 1871-10-31 | 1894-02-03 | 0.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 77 |
| 8188.0 | 1872-06-01 | 1894-02-03 | 0.5625 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 94 |
| 8871.0 | 1874-04-15 | 1894-02-03 | 0.875 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 134 |
| 12889.0 | 1885-04-15 | 1894-02-03 | 0.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 321 |
| 21376.16862 | 1896-03-01 | 1908-09-16 | 5.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 409.8 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 136 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 214 AF — 157% of that, and 13th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 209 | 11th lowest of 15 · 154% of median | 72 | 3.0 |
| 2011 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
| 2012 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2013 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 10 | 0.2 |
| 2015 | 127 | 6th lowest of 15 · 93% of median | 44 | 2.5 |
| 2016 | 130 | 7th lowest of 15 · 96% of median | 52 | 2.6 |
| 2017 | 419 | 14th lowest of 15 · 308% of median | 194 | 3.3 |
| 2018 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 9 | 0.0 |
| 2019 | 210 | 12th lowest of 15 · 154% of median | 131 | 2.7 |
| 2020 | 3 | 5th lowest of 15 · 2% of median | 24 | 0.5 |
| 2021 | 136 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 73 | 1.7 |
| 2022 | 136 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 68 | 2.5 |
| 2023 | 196 | 10th lowest of 15 · 144% of median | 60 | 2.1 |
| 2024 | 504 | 15th lowest of 15 · 371% of median | 139 | 4.8 |
| 2025 | 214 | 13th lowest of 15 · 157% of median | 72 | 2.4 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.