← My Water · Print / save as PDF
CAERADOCK DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 1200637 · 1 · HOWARD CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 19:48 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1873-04-10 — 153rd most senior of the 1967 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: TRINITY LAKE (1873-04-01). Immediately behind: RAGLAND AND COX DITCH (1873-04-10).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8501.0 | 1873-04-10 | 1894-02-03 | 2.8 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 115 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 149 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 239 AF — 160% of that, and 12th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 74 | 4th lowest of 15 · 50% of median | 177 | 0.3 |
| 2012 | 60 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 40% of median | 129 | 0.4 |
| 2013 | 87 | 5th lowest of 15 · 58% of median | 166 | 0.9 |
| 2014 | 72 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 48% of median | 108 | 1.6 |
| 2015 | 350 | 15th lowest of 15 · 235% of median | 156 | 2.9 |
| 2016 | 200 | 10th lowest of 15 · 134% of median | 138 | 1.1 |
| 2017 | 105 | 6th lowest of 15 · 70% of median | 195 | 0.5 |
| 2018 | 9 | 1st lowest of 15 · 6% of median | 46 | 0.2 |
| 2019 | 176 | 9th lowest of 15 · 118% of median | 179 | 1.3 |
| 2020 | 149 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 188 | 0.7 |
| 2021 | 109 | 7th lowest of 15 · 73% of median | 154 | 0.6 |
| 2022 | 221 | 11th lowest of 15 · 148% of median | 172 | 1.0 |
| 2023 | 296 | 13th lowest of 15 · 199% of median | 252 | 0.9 |
| 2024 | 309 | 14th lowest of 15 · 207% of median | 245 | 0.9 |
| 2025 | 239 | 12th lowest of 15 · 160% of median | 173 | 1.7 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.