← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

HARDY DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 1200659 · 1 · HARDSCRABBLE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 05:23 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1873-01-01134th most senior of the 1967 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CAMBLIN DITCH (1872-12-30). Immediately behind: UPPER PERRY DITCH (1873-01-03).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
8402.01873-01-011903-04-13 2.00.0 CIRR 106.5

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 0 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 0 AF — —% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2004 110 10th lowest of 15 · —% of median 53 2.0
2005 448 15th lowest of 15 · —% of median 135 2.8
2006 175 12th lowest of 15 · —% of median 114 1.4
2007 153 11th lowest of 15 · —% of median 66 2.6
2008 248 13th lowest of 15 · —% of median 139 1.2
2009 7 9th lowest of 15 · —% of median 38 0.1
2010 316 14th lowest of 15 · —% of median 215 0.9
2018 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 2 0.0
2019 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 2 0.0
2020 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 8 0.0
2021 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 8 0.0
2022 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 7 0.0
2023 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 3 0.0
2024 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 2 0.0
2025 0 1st lowest of 15 · —% of median 3 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 17238 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity patchy 71% of the irrigation seasons in 1912-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.