← My Water · Print / save as PDF
DEWEESE DYE DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 1200672 · 1 · GRAPE CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 23:46 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1866-02-28 — 47th most senior of the 1967 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: O'BRIEN DITCH (4 MILE) (1865-12-10). Immediately behind: SOUTH CANON DITCH (GRAPE CREEK APD) (1866-02-28).
Decreed rights (14)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5903.0 | 1866-02-28 | 1894-02-03 | 0.688 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 30 |
| 7882.0 | 1871-07-31 | 1896-03-12 | 2.34 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 29 |
| 8705.0 | 1873-10-31 | 1896-03-12 | 0.95 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 73 |
| 10043.0 | 1877-06-30 | 1896-03-12 | 1.33 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 189 |
| 10896.0 | 1879-10-31 | 1896-03-12 | 1.09 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 235 |
| 11202.0 | 1880-09-01 | 1896-03-12 | 0.77 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 282 |
| 11475.0 | 1881-06-01 | 1896-03-12 | 0.64 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 303A |
| 11839.0 | 1882-05-31 | 1896-03-12 | 0.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 332B |
| 12158.0 | 1883-04-15 | 1896-03-12 | 0.76 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 350 |
| 12235.0 | 1883-07-01 | 1896-03-12 | 0.82 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 363A |
| 14046.0 | 1888-06-15 | 1896-03-12 | 0.46 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 457A |
| 16398.0 | 1894-11-23 | 1916-02-14 | 1.5 | 0.0 | C | DOM | NI1 |
| 20002.16398 | 1894-11-23 | 1905-01-12 | 20.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 408 |
| 54421.32547 | 1939-02-10 | 1999-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | ALL |
Legal record & documents
15 decreed actions on record across
8 court cases:
99CW0160, 17CW3046, CA2637, CA2602, CA7783, CA4463, CA2574, CA2566.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
99CW0160 | 1 | 1999-12-31 | S |
17CW3046 | 1 | 1999-12-31 | S |
CA2637 | 1 | 1916-02-14 | O |
CA2602 | 1 | 1905-01-12 | S |
CA7783 | 6 | 1896-03-12 | O |
CA4463 | 2 | 1896-03-12 | O |
CA2574 | 2 | 1896-03-12 | O |
CA2566 | 1 | 1894-02-03 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 4,243 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 4,143 AF — 98% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 3,374 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 80% of median | 157 | 29.2 |
| 2012 | 4,568 | 10th lowest of 15 · 108% of median | 164 | 31.0 |
| 2013 | 3,845 | 4th lowest of 15 · 91% of median | 191 | 22.1 |
| 2014 | 3,934 | 5th lowest of 15 · 93% of median | 152 | 30.7 |
| 2015 | 4,573 | 11th lowest of 15 · 108% of median | 184 | 22.9 |
| 2016 | 4,489 | 9th lowest of 15 · 106% of median | 212 | 22.1 |
| 2017 | 2,112 | 1st lowest of 15 · 50% of median | 171 | 29.3 |
| 2018 | 4,243 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 363 | 29.6 |
| 2019 | 5,950 | 15th lowest of 15 · 140% of median | 303 | 43.4 |
| 2020 | 3,198 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 75% of median | 244 | 44.8 |
| 2021 | 5,092 | 13th lowest of 15 · 120% of median | 365 | 24.6 |
| 2022 | 5,132 | 14th lowest of 15 · 121% of median | 365 | 25.1 |
| 2023 | 4,077 | 6th lowest of 15 · 96% of median | 365 | 22.0 |
| 2024 | 5,020 | 12th lowest of 15 · 118% of median | 364 | 22.1 |
| 2025 | 4,143 | 7th lowest of 15 · 98% of median | 303 | 20.4 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 14 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 24162 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | continuous | 99% of the irrigation seasons in 1911-2025 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.