Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
TREMAYNE DITCH NO 2
Structure dossier · WDID 1200764 · 1 · WEST FOURMILE CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:27 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1872-06-30 — 132nd most senior of the 1967 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: PAULS DITCH (1872-06-20). Immediately behind: CAMBLIN DITCH (1872-12-30).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8217.0 | 1872-06-30 | 1894-02-03 | 1.4 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 98 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 10 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 10 AF — 100% of that, and 8th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | 139 | 12th lowest of 15 · 1390% of median | 51 | 1.4 |
| 2000 | 211 | 14th lowest of 15 · 2110% of median | 78 | 1.4 |
| 2001 | 262 | 15th lowest of 15 · 2620% of median | 134 | 1.0 |
| 2003 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
| 2015 | 156 | 13th lowest of 15 · 1560% of median | 82 | 1.4 |
| 2016 | 51 | 10th lowest of 15 · 510% of median | 74 | 1.6 |
| 2017 | 4 | 7th lowest of 15 · 40% of median | 39 | 0.4 |
| 2018 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 17 | 0.0 |
| 2019 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 26 | 0.0 |
| 2020 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 22 | 0.0 |
| 2021 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 6 | 0.0 |
| 2022 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 6 | 0.0 |
| 2023 | 38 | 9th lowest of 15 · 380% of median | 21 | 1.4 |
| 2024 | 63 | 11th lowest of 15 · 630% of median | 29 | 1.3 |
| 2025 | 10 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 5 | 1.2 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.