Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
SOMERVILLE DITCH NO 2
Structure dossier · WDID 1200770 · 1 · TALLAHASSEE CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 00:37 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1880-09-30 — 255th most senior of the 1967 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WELTY DITCH (1880-09-01). Immediately behind: AMY NORTH DITCH (1881-02-09).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11231.0 | 1880-09-30 | 1894-02-03 | 2.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 239 |
Legal record & documents
2 decreed actions on record across
2 court cases:
08CW0097, 02/03/1894.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
08CW0097 | 1 | 2008-12-31 | O |
02/03/1894 | 1 | 1894-02-03 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 14 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 165 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 212 AF — 128% of that, and 11th lowest of the 14 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1937 | 9 | 3rd lowest of 14 · 6% of median | 10 | 0.5 |
| 1938 | 28 | 5th lowest of 14 · 17% of median | 15 | 1.0 |
| 1970 | 0 | 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
| 1973 | 236 | 12th lowest of 14 · 143% of median | 120 | 1.0 |
| 1984 | 151 | 7th lowest of 14 · 92% of median | 124 | 0.6 |
| 1985 | 242 | 14th lowest of 14 · 147% of median | 245 | 0.5 |
| 2018 | 17 | 4th lowest of 14 · 10% of median | 53 | 0.2 |
| 2019 | 143 | 6th lowest of 14 · 87% of median | 88 | 1.0 |
| 2020 | 7 | 2nd lowest of 14 · 4% of median | 28 | 0.2 |
| 2021 | 179 | 8th lowest of 14 · 108% of median | 124 | 2.5 |
| 2022 | 189 | 9th lowest of 14 · 114% of median | 111 | 1.4 |
| 2023 | 236 | 12th lowest of 14 · 143% of median | 126 | 11.0 |
| 2024 | 204 | 10th lowest of 14 · 124% of median | 120 | 2.0 |
| 2025 | 212 | 11th lowest of 14 · 128% of median | 122 | 1.2 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 14 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 1 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 1288 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 7% of the irrigation seasons in 1937-2025 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.