← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ALLEN DITCH NO 1

Structure dossier · WDID 1200786 · 1 · GRIBBLES RUN · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:41 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1912-07-15687th most senior of the 1967 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: GIEM DITCH NO 2 (1908-04-01). Immediately behind: ALLEN DITCH NO 2 (1912-08-10).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
33859.228411912-07-151948-06-18 6.240.0 CIRRDOM 1948-7

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 79 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1971 143 10th lowest of 15 · 181% of median 73 1.0
1973 188 11th lowest of 15 · 238% of median 96 1.0
1979 242 13th lowest of 15 · 306% of median 123 1.0
1980 70 6th lowest of 15 · 89% of median 48 0.8
1981 122 9th lowest of 15 · 154% of median 124 0.5
1983 689 15th lowest of 15 · 872% of median 140 2.5
1985 230 12th lowest of 15 · 291% of median 59 2.0
2018 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2019 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2020 40 4th lowest of 15 · 51% of median 105 0.3
2021 280 14th lowest of 15 · 354% of median 227 1.1
2022 77 7th lowest of 15 · 98% of median 58 0.7
2023 79 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 107 0.4
2024 41 5th lowest of 15 · 52% of median 83 0.3
2025 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1248 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 11% of the irrigation seasons in 1970-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.